Still Seeking Coordination? Assessing German Employers’ Interests in the Digitalized Social Market Economy

Jan Weckwerth, Timo Weishaupt
{"title":"Still Seeking Coordination? Assessing German Employers’ Interests in the Digitalized Social Market Economy","authors":"Jan Weckwerth, Timo Weishaupt","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2019-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Do German employers in metal and electrical (M+E) sector still want to support core institutions of a coordinated market economy, and are capable of doing so? Based on evidence collected in a series of expert interviews conducted in 2017 and 2018 with employers’ associations, we argue that social partnership, collective bargaining, and strategic coordination via organizations are still part of the preferred modus operandi of these employers. Moreover, we argue that new forms of associational membership that enable firm-based, yet often collective, solutions, which have stabilized rather than eroded the organizational capacity of employers’ associations. As such, we provide supportive evidence for several core premises associated with the Varieties of Capitalism approach. Yet we also identify trends toward more flexibilization, decentralization, and systemic volatility in this system, as many small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in East Germany, remain without any associational membership.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"65 1","pages":"333 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2019-0013","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2019-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Do German employers in metal and electrical (M+E) sector still want to support core institutions of a coordinated market economy, and are capable of doing so? Based on evidence collected in a series of expert interviews conducted in 2017 and 2018 with employers’ associations, we argue that social partnership, collective bargaining, and strategic coordination via organizations are still part of the preferred modus operandi of these employers. Moreover, we argue that new forms of associational membership that enable firm-based, yet often collective, solutions, which have stabilized rather than eroded the organizational capacity of employers’ associations. As such, we provide supportive evidence for several core premises associated with the Varieties of Capitalism approach. Yet we also identify trends toward more flexibilization, decentralization, and systemic volatility in this system, as many small and medium-sized enterprises, especially in East Germany, remain without any associational membership.
还在寻求协调?德国雇主在数字化社会市场经济中的利益评估
摘要德国金属和电气(M+E)行业的雇主是否仍然希望支持协调市场经济的核心机构,并且有能力这样做?根据2017年和2018年与雇主协会进行的一系列专家访谈中收集的证据,我们认为,社会伙伴关系、集体谈判和通过组织进行的战略协调仍然是这些雇主首选的工作方式的一部分。此外,我们认为,新形式的协会成员能够实现基于公司但往往是集体的解决方案,这些解决方案稳定了而不是侵蚀了雇主协会的组织能力。因此,我们为与资本主义多样性方法相关的几个核心前提提供了支持性证据。然而,我们也发现了这个体系中更加灵活、权力下放和系统性波动的趋势,因为许多中小型企业,特别是东德的中小型企业仍然没有任何协会成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信