Russia vs. Ukraine: A Subaltern Empire Against the “Populism of Hope”

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Valeria Korablyova
{"title":"Russia vs. Ukraine: A Subaltern Empire Against the “Populism of Hope”","authors":"Valeria Korablyova","doi":"10.14712/23363231.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the ongoing Russian war against Ukraine from a postcolonial perspective. It argues that the structure of coloniality in the region is tripartite: besides Russia and Ukraine, the “West” is present as the main significant Other for both sides. With regard to the West, Russia is a “subaltern empire” and Ukraine is a “double subaltern,” peripheral to more than one center of power. Within this complex of imperiality and subalternity, Russia is engaging in a “catching-up imperialism” driven by resentment against the West. Russia has subsumed neighboring states, or parts of them, in brutal violation of the existing international order. Its leaders claim it is only mimicking the hegemon’s (i.e. the West’s) imperialist modus operandi. This geostrategic pattern is captured by Erik Ringmar’s notion of “recognition games.” Fighting in those “deadly games,” Zelensky’s Ukraine is breaking out of its place as a mute subaltern. The rhetorical aspect of Ukraine’s response to Russian aggression can be called a horizontal “populism of hope.” Ukraine has attained global visibility and recognition in the Northern hemisphere as a beacon of grassroots democracy, resilience and freedom. Russia, however, has rebranded itself as the spearhead of a global fight against Western hegemony. The outcome of this military and discursive standoff will largely define a future normative international order displaying new hierarchies of symbolic power.","PeriodicalId":33551,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the ongoing Russian war against Ukraine from a postcolonial perspective. It argues that the structure of coloniality in the region is tripartite: besides Russia and Ukraine, the “West” is present as the main significant Other for both sides. With regard to the West, Russia is a “subaltern empire” and Ukraine is a “double subaltern,” peripheral to more than one center of power. Within this complex of imperiality and subalternity, Russia is engaging in a “catching-up imperialism” driven by resentment against the West. Russia has subsumed neighboring states, or parts of them, in brutal violation of the existing international order. Its leaders claim it is only mimicking the hegemon’s (i.e. the West’s) imperialist modus operandi. This geostrategic pattern is captured by Erik Ringmar’s notion of “recognition games.” Fighting in those “deadly games,” Zelensky’s Ukraine is breaking out of its place as a mute subaltern. The rhetorical aspect of Ukraine’s response to Russian aggression can be called a horizontal “populism of hope.” Ukraine has attained global visibility and recognition in the Northern hemisphere as a beacon of grassroots democracy, resilience and freedom. Russia, however, has rebranded itself as the spearhead of a global fight against Western hegemony. The outcome of this military and discursive standoff will largely define a future normative international order displaying new hierarchies of symbolic power.
俄罗斯与乌克兰:对抗“希望民粹主义”的另类帝国
本文从后殖民的角度讨论了俄罗斯正在进行的对乌克兰战争。它认为,该地区的殖民主义结构是三方的:除了俄罗斯和乌克兰,“西方”是双方的主要重要他者。就西方而言,俄罗斯是一个“次级帝国”,乌克兰是一个多个权力中心的“双重次级帝国”。在这种专制和从属的情结中,俄罗斯正在进行一场由对西方的怨恨驱动的“追赶帝国主义”。俄罗斯粗暴地违反了现有的国际秩序,吞并了邻国或部分邻国。其领导人声称,这只是在模仿霸主(即西方)的帝国主义做法。埃里克·林马尔(Erik Ringmar)的“识别游戏”概念捕捉到了这种地缘战略模式。在那些“致命游戏”中,泽连斯基领导的乌克兰正在打破其沉默的替补地位。乌克兰对俄罗斯侵略的反应在修辞上可以被称为横向的“希望民粹主义”。乌克兰在北半球获得了全球知名度和认可,成为基层民主、韧性和自由的灯塔。然而,俄罗斯已经将自己重塑为全球对抗西方霸权的先锋。这场军事和话语对峙的结果将在很大程度上定义未来的规范性国际秩序,显示出新的象征性权力等级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信