Schematizations, or How to Draw a Thought

IF 2 2区社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES

Critical Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/726275

Fredric Jameson

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article sketches the emergence of visual schematisms from Immanuel Kant to Gilles Deleuze, Michel Foucault, and Jean-François Lyotard. It demonstrates the centrality of differentiation in these visual representations, as underscored by the “bar” or so-called vinculum (a mathematical term). It ultimately concludes that the weakness or dialectical contradiction of the thus differentiated entities lies in their tendency to fold back into each other, returning to the One which it was the purpose of the schematization to exclude in the first place.

查看原文本刊更多论文

图式，或如何画出一个想法

本文概述了视觉图式的出现，从康德到德勒兹、福柯和让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔。它证明了微分在这些视觉表征中的中心地位，正如“杠”或所谓的vinculum（一个数学术语）所强调的那样。它最终得出结论，如此分化的实体的弱点或辩证矛盾在于它们倾向于相互折叠，回到最初被图式化的目的所排斥的那个实体。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Inquiry Multiple-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Inquiry has published the best critical thought in the arts and humanities since 1974. Combining a commitment to rigorous scholarship with a vital concern for dialogue and debate, the journal presents articles by eminent critics, scholars, and artists on a wide variety of issues central to contemporary criticism and culture. In CI new ideas and reconsideration of those traditional in criticism and culture are granted a voice. The wide interdisciplinary focus creates surprising juxtapositions and linkages of concepts, offering new grounds for theoretical debate. In CI, authors entertain and challenge while illuminating such issues as improvisations, the life of things, Flaubert, and early modern women"s writing.