Comparison between Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis on Remission Induction: A Meta-Analysis

Kena Wang, Yongc hen, Jiayun Xu
{"title":"Comparison between Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis on Remission Induction: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Kena Wang, Yongc hen, Jiayun Xu","doi":"10.26420/austinjnephrolhypertens.2021.1103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Currently, immunosuppressants including cyclophosphamide and azathioprine are the main treatment options for anti-neutrophil associated vasculitis. However, since cyclophosphamide may cause serious adverse reactions, it is necessary to explore for a new drug, and rituximab is one option with less adverse reaction. There are a few studies on rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in the treatment of antineutrophil associated vasculitis. The meta-analysis is carried out to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab, compared with cyclophosphamide, as a remission induction therapy in AAV. Methods: Firstly we searched a Chinese database (CNKI, Wanfang) and English databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase) according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria before October, 2021. Then Revman5.4 and Stata were used for data analysis which was then integrated by fixed effects or random effects. Results: After browsing the full texts, we finally included 7 eligible articles, involving 737 patients in total. With Revman5.4 software, we could draw the following conclusions: 6-month complete response rate (Chi²=0.46, df=1 P=0.50 I²=0%), 12-month complete response rate (Chi²=0.31 df=1 P=0.58 I²=0%), 18-month complete response rate (Chi²=0.18 df=1 P=0.67 I²=0%). Adverse event (Chi²=3.15 df=4 P=0.53 I²=0%), respectively for reached primary endpoint, failed primary endpoint in contrast. The result showed (Chi²=3.29 df=3 P=0.35 I²=9%, Chi²=1.72 df=2 P=0.42 I²=0%), 6-momth relapse, 12-momth relapse, 18-month relapse (Chi²=0.22 df=1 P=0.64 I²=0%, Chi²=0.04 df=2 P=0.98 I²=0%, Chi²=0.13 df=1 P=0.72 I²=0%), GPA 0f 6-month (Chi²=0.47 df=1 P=0.50 I²=0%), MPA of 6-month (Chi²=1.52 df=1 P=0.22 I²=34%). The above data are statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on the above data, we can conclude that compared with cyclophosphamide, rituximab can play a certain role in the treatment of ANCA disease, improve the complete response rate, reduce the rate of adverse reactions and recurrence, and is expected to replace cyclophosphamide as a first-line drug in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":91451,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of nephrology and hypertension","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of nephrology and hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjnephrolhypertens.2021.1103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Currently, immunosuppressants including cyclophosphamide and azathioprine are the main treatment options for anti-neutrophil associated vasculitis. However, since cyclophosphamide may cause serious adverse reactions, it is necessary to explore for a new drug, and rituximab is one option with less adverse reaction. There are a few studies on rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in the treatment of antineutrophil associated vasculitis. The meta-analysis is carried out to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab, compared with cyclophosphamide, as a remission induction therapy in AAV. Methods: Firstly we searched a Chinese database (CNKI, Wanfang) and English databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase) according to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria before October, 2021. Then Revman5.4 and Stata were used for data analysis which was then integrated by fixed effects or random effects. Results: After browsing the full texts, we finally included 7 eligible articles, involving 737 patients in total. With Revman5.4 software, we could draw the following conclusions: 6-month complete response rate (Chi²=0.46, df=1 P=0.50 I²=0%), 12-month complete response rate (Chi²=0.31 df=1 P=0.58 I²=0%), 18-month complete response rate (Chi²=0.18 df=1 P=0.67 I²=0%). Adverse event (Chi²=3.15 df=4 P=0.53 I²=0%), respectively for reached primary endpoint, failed primary endpoint in contrast. The result showed (Chi²=3.29 df=3 P=0.35 I²=9%, Chi²=1.72 df=2 P=0.42 I²=0%), 6-momth relapse, 12-momth relapse, 18-month relapse (Chi²=0.22 df=1 P=0.64 I²=0%, Chi²=0.04 df=2 P=0.98 I²=0%, Chi²=0.13 df=1 P=0.72 I²=0%), GPA 0f 6-month (Chi²=0.47 df=1 P=0.50 I²=0%), MPA of 6-month (Chi²=1.52 df=1 P=0.22 I²=34%). The above data are statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on the above data, we can conclude that compared with cyclophosphamide, rituximab can play a certain role in the treatment of ANCA disease, improve the complete response rate, reduce the rate of adverse reactions and recurrence, and is expected to replace cyclophosphamide as a first-line drug in clinical practice.
利妥昔单抗与环磷酰胺治疗ANCA相关血管炎缓解诱导期疗效比较:Meta分析
目的:目前,免疫抑制剂包括环磷酰胺和硫唑嘌呤是抗中性粒细胞相关性血管炎的主要治疗选择。然而,由于环磷酰胺可能引起严重的不良反应,有必要探索新的药物,利妥昔单抗是不良反应较小的一种选择。有一些研究利妥昔单抗与环磷酰胺治疗抗中性粒细胞相关性血管炎。本荟萃分析旨在评价美罗华与环磷酰胺作为AAV缓解诱导疗法的疗效。方法:首先根据2021年10月前的纳入标准和排除标准检索中文数据库(中国知网、万方)和英文数据库(Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase)。然后使用Revman5.4和Stata进行数据分析,再进行固定效应或随机效应的整合。结果:在浏览全文后,我们最终纳入了7篇符合条件的文章,共涉及737例患者。利用Revman5.4软件,我们可以得出以下结论:6个月完全缓解率(Chi²=0.46,df=1 P=0.50 I²=0%),12个月完全缓解率(Chi²=0.31 df=1 P=0.58 I²=0%),18个月完全缓解率(Chi²=0.18 df=1 P=0.67 I²=0%)。不良事件(Chi²=3.15 df=4 P=0.53 I²=0%)分别为达到主要终点和未达到主要终点。结果显示(Chi²=3.29 df=3 P=0.35 I²=9%,Chi²=1.72 df=2 P=0.42 I²=0%),6个月复发,12个月复发,18个月复发(Chi²=0.22 df=1 P=0.64 I²=0%,Chi²=0.04 df=2 P=0.98 I²=0%,Chi²=0.13 df=1 P=0.72 I²=0%),6个月GPA = 0f (Chi²=0.47 df=1 P=0.50 I²=0%),6个月MPA (Chi²=1.52 df=1 P=0.22 I²=34%)。以上数据具有统计学意义。结论:综合以上数据,我们可以得出结论,与环磷酰胺相比,利妥昔单抗在ANCA疾病的治疗中可以起到一定的作用,提高了完全缓解率,降低了不良反应和复发率,有望在临床实践中取代环磷酰胺成为一线药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信