THE ISSUE OF CREATIVE ACTIVITY EVALUATION AT THE ART LESSON

B. Dmitrienko, O. A. Kovaleva, E. Rubets
{"title":"THE ISSUE OF CREATIVE ACTIVITY EVALUATION AT THE ART LESSON","authors":"B. Dmitrienko, O. A. Kovaleva, E. Rubets","doi":"10.12731/2658-4034-2022-13-4-58-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study. The paper is devoted to the study of the creative activity evaluating problem. The subject of the study is the evaluation criteria. At present, it seems obvious that there is a need to systematize and structure knowledge in the field of theory and methods of teaching fine arts. \nIn particular, special attention should be paid to the problem of evaluating students’ works in the fine arts lesson. Despite the fact that the Federal State Standard of General Education sets requirements for the development of the basic educational program, the question of the correct assessment of the creative activity of students remains open for modern teachers. \nIn this regard, the purpose of this paper is to study the specifics of evaluating creative activity and its results in a fine art lesson at school. \nResults and discussion. The classical five–point assessment system is not fully sufficient in fine art lessons, therefore, an internal one–hundred-point assessment system should be included, which would clearly indicate strengths and weaknesses of each student. \nConclusion. The assessment of students’ creative achievements is a multifaceted process that requires taking into account a number of students` characteristics and the clear and consistent understanding of the criteria apparatus.","PeriodicalId":33016,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Education and Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Education and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2022-13-4-58-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study. The paper is devoted to the study of the creative activity evaluating problem. The subject of the study is the evaluation criteria. At present, it seems obvious that there is a need to systematize and structure knowledge in the field of theory and methods of teaching fine arts. In particular, special attention should be paid to the problem of evaluating students’ works in the fine arts lesson. Despite the fact that the Federal State Standard of General Education sets requirements for the development of the basic educational program, the question of the correct assessment of the creative activity of students remains open for modern teachers. In this regard, the purpose of this paper is to study the specifics of evaluating creative activity and its results in a fine art lesson at school. Results and discussion. The classical five–point assessment system is not fully sufficient in fine art lessons, therefore, an internal one–hundred-point assessment system should be included, which would clearly indicate strengths and weaknesses of each student. Conclusion. The assessment of students’ creative achievements is a multifaceted process that requires taking into account a number of students` characteristics and the clear and consistent understanding of the criteria apparatus.
美术课创造性活动评价问题
研究的相关性。本文致力于对创造性活动评价问题的研究。研究的主题是评估标准。目前,在美术教学的理论和方法领域,似乎有必要对知识进行系统化和结构化。在美术课教学中,应特别注意对学生作品的评价问题。尽管《联邦普通教育国家标准》对基础教育课程的发展提出了要求,但对学生创造性活动的正确评估问题仍然对现代教师开放。在这方面,本文的目的是研究在学校美术课上评估创造性活动及其结果的细节。结果和讨论。传统的五分评估体系在美术课上并不充分,因此,应该包括一个内部的一百分评估体系,这将清楚地表明每个学生的长处和短处。结论对学生创造性成就的评估是一个多方面的过程,需要考虑到一些学生的特点以及对标准装置的清晰一致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信