Addressing wicked problems. Collaboration, trust and the role of shared principles at the philanthropy and government interface

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
R. Strachwitz, R. Alter, T. Unger
{"title":"Addressing wicked problems. Collaboration, trust and the role of shared principles at the philanthropy and government interface","authors":"R. Strachwitz, R. Alter, T. Unger","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Collaborative activities at the interface of philanthropy and government are increasingly assumed to be a desirable answer to complex—even wicked—public problems. Against this backdrop, this article discusses different types of collaborations, their accompanying levels of difficulty, and the roles that philanthropies might play in these efforts. Although this collaboration might hold promising potential, it will be argued that success will be very difficult to achieve. Consequently, indications are that philanthropies interested in increasing their collaborative activities at the interface of government might need to adjust their expectations and enhance their frustration tolerance. However, trust is seen as the central driver of collaborations across all sectors. By adopting a common approach to managing philanthropic practice, such as a joint performance management, that includes a broad understanding of performance beyond fixed indicators, it is argued that philanthropies are able to operationalize the resource trust. The Philanthropy. Insight Assessment Tool is proposed as a starting point for a joint conversation on the current and future philanthropic practice and its principles, including debates on the practical value of performance management systems.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Collaborative activities at the interface of philanthropy and government are increasingly assumed to be a desirable answer to complex—even wicked—public problems. Against this backdrop, this article discusses different types of collaborations, their accompanying levels of difficulty, and the roles that philanthropies might play in these efforts. Although this collaboration might hold promising potential, it will be argued that success will be very difficult to achieve. Consequently, indications are that philanthropies interested in increasing their collaborative activities at the interface of government might need to adjust their expectations and enhance their frustration tolerance. However, trust is seen as the central driver of collaborations across all sectors. By adopting a common approach to managing philanthropic practice, such as a joint performance management, that includes a broad understanding of performance beyond fixed indicators, it is argued that philanthropies are able to operationalize the resource trust. The Philanthropy. Insight Assessment Tool is proposed as a starting point for a joint conversation on the current and future philanthropic practice and its principles, including debates on the practical value of performance management systems.
解决棘手的问题。合作、信任以及慈善机构和政府之间共同原则的作用
慈善事业和政府之间的合作活动越来越被认为是解决复杂甚至邪恶的公共问题的理想答案。在这种背景下,本文讨论了不同类型的合作,它们所伴随的困难程度,以及慈善机构在这些努力中可能扮演的角色。尽管这种合作可能具有很有希望的潜力,但有人认为,要取得成功将非常困难。因此,有迹象表明,有兴趣在政府界面上增加合作活动的慈善机构可能需要调整他们的期望,提高他们对挫折的容忍度。然而,信任被视为所有部门合作的核心驱动力。通过采用共同的方法来管理慈善实践,例如联合绩效管理,其中包括对固定指标之外的绩效的广泛理解,有人认为慈善机构能够运作资源信托。慈善事业。洞察评估工具被提议作为关于当前和未来慈善实践及其原则的联合对话的起点,包括关于绩效管理系统的实际价值的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信