LEFT IN THE PERIPHERY: AN ANALYSIS OF VOTING RIGHTS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN ZIMBABWE

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Nkosana Maphosa, CG Moyo, B. Moyo
{"title":"LEFT IN THE PERIPHERY: AN ANALYSIS OF VOTING RIGHTS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN ZIMBABWE","authors":"Nkosana Maphosa, CG Moyo, B. Moyo","doi":"10.29053/2413-7138/2019/v7a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Zimbabwe, the right to vote is a constitutionally guaranteed right which can only be exercised by citizens who meet prescribed minimum requirements. Notwithstanding, the modalities meant to ensure that persons with disabilities participate in decision-making processes, usually through elections, are arguably inadequate. In the Zimbabwean context (and indeed in most African countries) the right to vote is underlined by a history of blatant racial exclusion and discrimination where the right was exclusively enjoyed by the white minority. Despite this regressive phenomenon; the 2013 constitutional dispensation makes a progressive clarion call for the inclusion of every citizen in the right to vote or to stand for public office, a move which underscores how a democratic society should function. Being a part of the international community, the country is also a signatory to international conventions such as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; all of which deeply entrench the right to universal and equal suffrage. Consequently, this article examines the right to vote of persons with disabilities from a human rights perspective converse to an arguably untenable welfare model. Therefore, the overarching intent of the article is to succinctly analyse laws and where relevant, policies which seek to promote the participation of persons with disabilities in elections; identify practical barriers and enablers that can engender the participation of persons with disabilities; assess approaches and interventions that have been employed in Zimbabwe to increase the participation of persons with disabilities in elections and interrogate the possible impact of the said interventions.","PeriodicalId":41087,"journal":{"name":"African Disability Rights Yearbook","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Disability Rights Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29053/2413-7138/2019/v7a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Zimbabwe, the right to vote is a constitutionally guaranteed right which can only be exercised by citizens who meet prescribed minimum requirements. Notwithstanding, the modalities meant to ensure that persons with disabilities participate in decision-making processes, usually through elections, are arguably inadequate. In the Zimbabwean context (and indeed in most African countries) the right to vote is underlined by a history of blatant racial exclusion and discrimination where the right was exclusively enjoyed by the white minority. Despite this regressive phenomenon; the 2013 constitutional dispensation makes a progressive clarion call for the inclusion of every citizen in the right to vote or to stand for public office, a move which underscores how a democratic society should function. Being a part of the international community, the country is also a signatory to international conventions such as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; all of which deeply entrench the right to universal and equal suffrage. Consequently, this article examines the right to vote of persons with disabilities from a human rights perspective converse to an arguably untenable welfare model. Therefore, the overarching intent of the article is to succinctly analyse laws and where relevant, policies which seek to promote the participation of persons with disabilities in elections; identify practical barriers and enablers that can engender the participation of persons with disabilities; assess approaches and interventions that have been employed in Zimbabwe to increase the participation of persons with disabilities in elections and interrogate the possible impact of the said interventions.
边缘化:对津巴布韦残疾人投票权的分析
在津巴布韦,选举权是宪法保障的权利,只有符合规定最低要求的公民才能行使。尽管如此,旨在确保残疾人参与决策过程的方式,通常是通过选举,可以说是不够的。在津巴布韦(事实上在大多数非洲国家),投票权受到公然种族排斥和歧视的历史的强调,在这种情况下,投票权只由白人少数群体享有。尽管存在这种倒退现象;2013年的宪法豁免发出了一个进步的号角,呼吁让每个公民都有投票权或竞选公职的权利,此举突显了民主社会应该如何运作。作为国际社会的一部分,该国也是《残疾人权利公约》、《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》和《世界人权宣言》等国际公约的签署国;所有这些都深深地巩固了普遍和平等选举权。因此,本文从人权的角度审视了残疾人的投票权,而不是一种可以说站不住脚的福利模式。因此,该条的总体意图是简明扼要地分析旨在促进残疾人参与选举的法律和相关政策;确定能够促使残疾人参与的实际障碍和促进因素;评估津巴布韦为提高残疾人参与选举而采取的方法和干预措施,并询问上述干预措施可能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书