{"title":"Numerical Modelling of Wind Flow In Street Canyon Between High-Rise Buildings with Angle of Attack Modifications","authors":"D. Priambodo, Y. Sanjaya, P. Sarli, H. Setio","doi":"10.14710/mkts.v28i2.37220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In fluid dynamics analysis, one of the things to do is to perform numerical modeling validated on the resultsof experimentation. In numerical modeling of wind flow there are several forms of modeling used includingRANS, LES, DNS, etc. where the modeling has its own advantages and disadvantages. Among these models,RANS is a model that has the cheapest computer expense compared to other models so that it has the highestworkability. Therefore, rans method testing (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes) was conducted to determinethe capability of turbulence models in checking wind speed contours on the road between 4 simplesymmetrical tall buildings with 0o, 30o, and 45o attack an gles validated with the results ofexperimentation. This research was conducted using RANS modeling (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes) andstandard turbulence model k-ε and validated using Low Speed Wind Tunnel and PIV (Particle ImageVelocimetry). According to the results of the test, U/Uo wind speed conditions obtained in wind modelingwith RANS and k-ε standards have errors that are still acceptable.","PeriodicalId":31880,"journal":{"name":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v28i2.37220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In fluid dynamics analysis, one of the things to do is to perform numerical modeling validated on the resultsof experimentation. In numerical modeling of wind flow there are several forms of modeling used includingRANS, LES, DNS, etc. where the modeling has its own advantages and disadvantages. Among these models,RANS is a model that has the cheapest computer expense compared to other models so that it has the highestworkability. Therefore, rans method testing (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes) was conducted to determinethe capability of turbulence models in checking wind speed contours on the road between 4 simplesymmetrical tall buildings with 0o, 30o, and 45o attack an gles validated with the results ofexperimentation. This research was conducted using RANS modeling (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes) andstandard turbulence model k-ε and validated using Low Speed Wind Tunnel and PIV (Particle ImageVelocimetry). According to the results of the test, U/Uo wind speed conditions obtained in wind modelingwith RANS and k-ε standards have errors that are still acceptable.
在流体动力学分析中,要做的一件事是在实验结果上进行数值模拟。在风流的数值模拟中,有几种建模形式,包括grans、LES、DNS等,这些建模形式各有优缺点。在这些模型中,与其他模型相比,RANS是计算机费用最便宜的模型,因此具有最高的可操作性。因此,进行了rans方法测试(Reynolds average Navier Stokes),以确定湍流模型在4个简单对称的高层建筑之间的道路上检查风速等高线的能力,并通过实验结果验证了0、300和45度的攻击角。本研究采用RANS模型(Reynolds average Navier Stokes)和标准湍流模型k-ε进行,并使用低速风洞和PIV (Particle imagelocimetry)进行验证。试验结果表明,用RANS和k-ε标准进行风建模得到的U/ o风速条件存在可接受的误差。