The Influence of Early Rehabilitation on Changes in the Range of Spinal and Thoracic Mobility in Patients after Thoracotomy Due to Lung Cancer Depending on Used Anaesthesia

Q4 Medicine
Monika Bal-Bocheńska, J. Wyszyńska, M. Kołodziej
{"title":"The Influence of Early Rehabilitation on Changes in the Range of Spinal and \nThoracic Mobility in Patients after Thoracotomy Due to Lung Cancer Depending on Used Anaesthesia","authors":"Monika Bal-Bocheńska, J. Wyszyńska, M. Kołodziej","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To the best of our knowledge, no reports are available on the relationship between the technique of anaesthesia and the effects of rehabilitation.\n\nObjective: The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of early rehabilitation on changes in range of spinal and thoracic mobility with different pain control after thoracotomy due to lung cancer.\n\nMaterial and methods: The study involved 100 patients following lung lobe resection by open anterolateral thoracotomy. After the operation, participants were assigned to 2 groups depending on the use of additional anaesthesia. All participants received standardised post-operative physiotherapy. The range of mobility of the spine and chest, the verbal rating scale (VRS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured before and on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after surgery.\n\nResults: In the study, an increase was shown in measurements for patients from both groups undergoing the rehabilitation programme after surgery. Mobility was highly significant in the study group. However, the mobility of the chest decreased in both groups, and in subsequent measurements following physiotherapy, its range improved, although it did not reach the baseline level even on the 7th day after the procedure. Consequently, 1 week after surgery, the decrease in spinal mobility among the group with standard anaesthesia was 1.3 cm greater than in the group with additional anaesthesia (-1.5 vs. -0.2 cm). Pain changes were greater in the control group.\n\nConclusions: 1. It may be concluded that the mobility of the thoracic spine after the procedure in decreased both groups, to later significantly improve for subsequent measurements in favour of patients with additional analgesia. 2. Respiratory mechanics of the chest and the level of pain, both measured by the VRS and VAS, systematically decreased in subsequent measurements after surgery among both groups, however, greater respiratory mobility was noted in the group of patients with additional analgesia. 3. It was demonstrated that the patients from the study group achieved optimal measurement values in relation to the control group, which were measured several times after the procedure, demonstrating a shorter and effective post-operative rehabilitation process.\n\n","PeriodicalId":35329,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To the best of our knowledge, no reports are available on the relationship between the technique of anaesthesia and the effects of rehabilitation. Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of early rehabilitation on changes in range of spinal and thoracic mobility with different pain control after thoracotomy due to lung cancer. Material and methods: The study involved 100 patients following lung lobe resection by open anterolateral thoracotomy. After the operation, participants were assigned to 2 groups depending on the use of additional anaesthesia. All participants received standardised post-operative physiotherapy. The range of mobility of the spine and chest, the verbal rating scale (VRS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured before and on the 1st, 3rd and 7th day after surgery. Results: In the study, an increase was shown in measurements for patients from both groups undergoing the rehabilitation programme after surgery. Mobility was highly significant in the study group. However, the mobility of the chest decreased in both groups, and in subsequent measurements following physiotherapy, its range improved, although it did not reach the baseline level even on the 7th day after the procedure. Consequently, 1 week after surgery, the decrease in spinal mobility among the group with standard anaesthesia was 1.3 cm greater than in the group with additional anaesthesia (-1.5 vs. -0.2 cm). Pain changes were greater in the control group. Conclusions: 1. It may be concluded that the mobility of the thoracic spine after the procedure in decreased both groups, to later significantly improve for subsequent measurements in favour of patients with additional analgesia. 2. Respiratory mechanics of the chest and the level of pain, both measured by the VRS and VAS, systematically decreased in subsequent measurements after surgery among both groups, however, greater respiratory mobility was noted in the group of patients with additional analgesia. 3. It was demonstrated that the patients from the study group achieved optimal measurement values in relation to the control group, which were measured several times after the procedure, demonstrating a shorter and effective post-operative rehabilitation process.
早期康复对肺癌开胸术后依赖二手麻醉患者脊柱和胸部活动范围变化的影响
据我们所知,没有关于麻醉技术与康复效果之间关系的报道。目的:探讨早期康复对肺癌开胸术后不同疼痛控制方式下脊柱和胸部活动范围变化的影响。材料和方法:研究对象为100例经开放性前外侧开胸肺叶切除术的患者。手术后,根据附加麻醉的使用情况将参与者分为两组。所有参与者均接受标准化的术后物理治疗。术前、术后第1天、第3天、第7天分别测量患者脊柱、胸部活动范围、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和口头评定量表(VRS)。结果:在这项研究中,两组患者在手术后接受康复计划的测量结果都有所增加。活动度在研究组中非常显著。然而,两组患者的胸部活动度均有所下降,在物理治疗后的后续测量中,其活动度有所改善,尽管在手术后第7天仍未达到基线水平。因此,术后1周,标准麻醉组的脊柱活动度下降幅度比额外麻醉组大1.3 cm (-1.5 vs -0.2 cm)。对照组的疼痛变化更大。结论:1。可以得出结论,两组患者手术后胸椎的活动度均有所下降,但随后的测量结果明显改善,这有利于额外镇痛的患者。2. 通过VRS和VAS测量的胸部呼吸力学和疼痛水平在两组手术后的后续测量中都有系统地下降,然而,在额外镇痛的患者组中发现呼吸活动性更大。3.结果表明,研究组患者在术后多次测量的测量值较对照组达到最佳,显示出更短、更有效的术后康复过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rehabilitacja Medyczna
Rehabilitacja Medyczna Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信