Between social documentary and a global aesthetic: the use of landscape by early-career South African photographers

Meghan L. E. Kirkwood
{"title":"Between social documentary and a global aesthetic: the use of landscape by early-career South African photographers","authors":"Meghan L. E. Kirkwood","doi":"10.1080/17540763.2022.2060289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines work from three South African artists—Vincent Bezuidenhout, Renzske Scholtz, and Jabulani Dhlamini—and argues that they use landscape images to find alignment or clarity between themselves, the social and political history of their country, and its land. Caught between a generation of activists who immersed themselves in views of a contested landscape, and another generation who did not experience life under apartheid, these photographers must balance what they see in the landscape in a contemporary context and its history into their representations. In “Separate Amenities,” Bezuidenhout examines how segregated recreational areas inscribed racist views into the South African coastline. In her series “The Farm,” Scholtz uses triptychs to combine archival imagery, contemporary photographs, and personal artifacts from a family property that was bought by the apartheid state and used as a prisoner camp. Jabulani Dhlamini revisits locations in the Sharpeville township connected to the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre. Finally, this article asserts that the landscape medium offers artists such as Bezuidenhout, Scholtz, and Dhlamini a space in which to mediate and engage the influence of the social documentary tradition in a post-apartheid art-making context—all while developing their identities as professional artists engaged in a global photographic dialog.","PeriodicalId":39970,"journal":{"name":"Photographies","volume":"15 1","pages":"289 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2022.2060289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines work from three South African artists—Vincent Bezuidenhout, Renzske Scholtz, and Jabulani Dhlamini—and argues that they use landscape images to find alignment or clarity between themselves, the social and political history of their country, and its land. Caught between a generation of activists who immersed themselves in views of a contested landscape, and another generation who did not experience life under apartheid, these photographers must balance what they see in the landscape in a contemporary context and its history into their representations. In “Separate Amenities,” Bezuidenhout examines how segregated recreational areas inscribed racist views into the South African coastline. In her series “The Farm,” Scholtz uses triptychs to combine archival imagery, contemporary photographs, and personal artifacts from a family property that was bought by the apartheid state and used as a prisoner camp. Jabulani Dhlamini revisits locations in the Sharpeville township connected to the 1960 Sharpeville Massacre. Finally, this article asserts that the landscape medium offers artists such as Bezuidenhout, Scholtz, and Dhlamini a space in which to mediate and engage the influence of the social documentary tradition in a post-apartheid art-making context—all while developing their identities as professional artists engaged in a global photographic dialog.
在社会纪录片和全球美学之间:南非早期摄影师对风景的使用
这篇文章考察了三位南非艺术家的作品——文森特·贝祖登胡特、伦茨克·朔尔茨和贾布拉尼·德拉米尼——并认为他们使用风景图像来寻找自己、国家的社会和政治历史以及土地之间的一致性或清晰度。这些摄影师被夹在一代活动家和另一代活动家之间,他们沉浸在有争议的景观中,而另一代人则没有经历过种族隔离下的生活,他们必须平衡他们在当代背景下看到的景观及其历史与他们的表现。在《独立的便利设施》一书中,贝祖登胡特探讨了隔离的娱乐区是如何将种族主义观点融入南非海岸线的。在她的系列作品《农场》中,朔尔茨使用三联画将档案图像、当代照片和一处被种族隔离国家买下并用作战俘营的家庭财产中的个人文物结合在一起。Jabulani Dhlamini重访沙佩维尔镇与1960年沙佩维尔大屠杀有关的地点。最后,本文断言,景观媒介为Bezuidenhout、Scholtz和Dhlamini等艺术家提供了一个空间,在后种族隔离的艺术创作背景下,他们可以在其中调解和参与社会纪录片传统的影响,同时发展他们作为参与全球摄影对话的专业艺术家的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Photographies
Photographies Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信