Mapping Tensions: Positioning Community Engagement Challenges as Generative Space

Jen Almjeld, Jennifer PeeksMease, Iona Black, K. Cresawn, Steven E. Grande, J. Liu
{"title":"Mapping Tensions: Positioning Community Engagement Challenges as Generative Space","authors":"Jen Almjeld, Jennifer PeeksMease, Iona Black, K. Cresawn, Steven E. Grande, J. Liu","doi":"10.54656/jces.v14i2.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research offers a contextual snapshot—via the applied tensional analysis (ATA) method—of common barriers that educators face when taking on community engagement work. A six-person research team interviewed 22 faculty and staff actively pursuing community partnerships at three different institutions of higher education in a single region. Participants’ responses were coded to identify common barriers to engagement and the strategies that participants used to overcome those barriers. We draw on ATA (Mease, 2019) as a methodological approach that acknowledges tensions as critical entry points for understanding both the experiences of individual actors and the malleable structures from which those tensions emerge. This article does not attempt to offer one-size-fits-all strategies for community engagement. Instead, it offers ATA as a means for contextualizing specific tensions and strategies within local community engagement settings and for reframing those tensions as generative spaces for community engagement work.","PeriodicalId":73680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community engagement and scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v14i2.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research offers a contextual snapshot—via the applied tensional analysis (ATA) method—of common barriers that educators face when taking on community engagement work. A six-person research team interviewed 22 faculty and staff actively pursuing community partnerships at three different institutions of higher education in a single region. Participants’ responses were coded to identify common barriers to engagement and the strategies that participants used to overcome those barriers. We draw on ATA (Mease, 2019) as a methodological approach that acknowledges tensions as critical entry points for understanding both the experiences of individual actors and the malleable structures from which those tensions emerge. This article does not attempt to offer one-size-fits-all strategies for community engagement. Instead, it offers ATA as a means for contextualizing specific tensions and strategies within local community engagement settings and for reframing those tensions as generative spaces for community engagement work.
映射紧张关系:将社区参与挑战定位为生成空间
本研究通过应用张力分析(ATA)方法提供了教育工作者在从事社区参与工作时面临的常见障碍的背景快照。一个由六人组成的研究小组采访了22名教职员工,他们在同一个地区的三所不同的高等教育机构积极寻求社区伙伴关系。参与者的回答被编码,以确定参与的常见障碍和参与者用来克服这些障碍的策略。我们借鉴了ATA (Mease, 2019)作为一种方法论方法,它承认紧张是理解个体行为者经历和产生这些紧张的可塑性结构的关键切入点。本文并不试图为社区参与提供一刀切的策略。相反,它将ATA作为一种手段,将当地社区参与环境中的特定紧张关系和策略置于背景中,并将这些紧张关系重新构建为社区参与工作的生成空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信