Comparison of Surgical Outcome between Endoscopic and Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Khalid Mahmud, M. Alam, Mainul Islam, M. H. Rahman, Riashat Azim Majumder, N. Akhtar, P. G. Datta, Abirvab Naha
{"title":"Comparison of Surgical Outcome between Endoscopic and Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty","authors":"Khalid Mahmud, M. Alam, Mainul Islam, M. H. Rahman, Riashat Azim Majumder, N. Akhtar, P. G. Datta, Abirvab Naha","doi":"10.3329/bjo.v26i2.50611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is the long-standing infection of a part or whole of middle ear cleft characterized by ear discharge & perforation. The most common presenting symptoms are ear discharge, mild to severe hearing loss, sometimes tinnitus even vertigo. Treatment of COM is mainly operative. The treatment of inactive mucosal variety of COM is Type 1 tympanoplasty. It can be done by microscopic or endoscopic technique. Both methods have some merits and demerits. \nObjectives: Aim of the study was to compare the surgical outcomes between endoscopic and microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. \nMethods: This study was carried out in the Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck surgery of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from March 2017 to June 2019 and 60 (30 in each group) patient were included in the study. All patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty. In Group A endoscopic tympanoplasty cases and in Group B microscopic tympanoplasty cases were placed. Operation duration, post-operative pain, postoperative hearing status, graft uptake was compared in two groups. \nResults: There were no significant difference of graft uptake and hearing gain (>0.05). But endoscopic operative time and post-operative pain were less than microscopic group (<0.05). \nConclusion: Through endoscopic tympanoplasty is a newer approach and it has some limitations. As endoscopic tympanoplasty requires less time, less pain with similar graft uptake and audiological success. It can be adopted as an alternative method of tympanoplasty. \nBangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; October 2020; 26(2): 109-115","PeriodicalId":53915,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"26 1","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v26i2.50611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is the long-standing infection of a part or whole of middle ear cleft characterized by ear discharge & perforation. The most common presenting symptoms are ear discharge, mild to severe hearing loss, sometimes tinnitus even vertigo. Treatment of COM is mainly operative. The treatment of inactive mucosal variety of COM is Type 1 tympanoplasty. It can be done by microscopic or endoscopic technique. Both methods have some merits and demerits. Objectives: Aim of the study was to compare the surgical outcomes between endoscopic and microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. Methods: This study was carried out in the Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck surgery of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from March 2017 to June 2019 and 60 (30 in each group) patient were included in the study. All patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty. In Group A endoscopic tympanoplasty cases and in Group B microscopic tympanoplasty cases were placed. Operation duration, post-operative pain, postoperative hearing status, graft uptake was compared in two groups. Results: There were no significant difference of graft uptake and hearing gain (>0.05). But endoscopic operative time and post-operative pain were less than microscopic group (<0.05). Conclusion: Through endoscopic tympanoplasty is a newer approach and it has some limitations. As endoscopic tympanoplasty requires less time, less pain with similar graft uptake and audiological success. It can be adopted as an alternative method of tympanoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; October 2020; 26(2): 109-115
内镜和显微镜下1型鼓室成形术的疗效比较
背景:慢性中耳炎(Chronic otitis medium, COM)是中耳裂口部分或全部的长期感染,表现为耳漏及耳穿孔。最常见的症状是耳塞,轻微到严重的听力损失,有时耳鸣甚至眩晕。COM的治疗以手术为主。1型鼓室成形术治疗COM的无活性粘膜病变。它可以通过显微镜或内窥镜技术来完成。两种方法各有优缺点。目的:比较内镜下与显微镜下1型鼓室成形术的手术效果。方法:本研究于2017年3月至2019年6月在达卡Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学耳鼻喉头颈外科进行,共纳入60例患者(每组30例)。所有患者均行1型鼓室成形术。A组为内窥镜鼓室成形术组,B组为镜下鼓室成形术组。比较两组患者手术时间、术后疼痛、术后听力、移植物摄取情况。结果:两组患者移植物摄取和听力增加无显著差异(>.05)。但内镜组手术时间和术后疼痛均少于镜下组(<0.05)。结论:内镜下鼓室成形术是一种较新的方法,但存在一定的局限性。由于内窥镜鼓室成形术需要更少的时间,更少的疼痛,具有相似的移植物摄取和听力学成功。它可以作为鼓室成形术的一种替代方法。孟加拉国J耳鼻咽喉;2020年10月;26 (2): 109 - 115
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信