We Are Not Struck with Blindness: The Establishment Clause and Religiously Motivated State Preemption of Municipal Non-Discrimination Law

K. Ritter
{"title":"We Are Not Struck with Blindness: The Establishment Clause and Religiously Motivated State Preemption of Municipal Non-Discrimination Law","authors":"K. Ritter","doi":"10.7916/CJGL.V39I1.4560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On August 19, 2019, the City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas, had a ten-hour meeting. More than a hundred citizens lined up to share their thoughts on Ordinance 119, a proposed regulation that had become a source of great public debate in the town. Only after they had all spoken did the meeting adjourn at 3:30 AM. The City Council then passed Ordinance 119 by a six-to-two margin, approving its establishment of protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in the city’s nondiscrimination law, and making Fayetteville the first town in the state to extend such protections to LGBT individuals. Six months later, the law was invalidated. The Arkansas General Assembly preempted Fayetteville’s legislation, making it outside of the city’s authority as a municipality to create protected classes beyond those that exist at the state level. Arkansas state law does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity.","PeriodicalId":84468,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of gender and law","volume":"39 1","pages":"205-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of gender and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/CJGL.V39I1.4560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On August 19, 2019, the City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas, had a ten-hour meeting. More than a hundred citizens lined up to share their thoughts on Ordinance 119, a proposed regulation that had become a source of great public debate in the town. Only after they had all spoken did the meeting adjourn at 3:30 AM. The City Council then passed Ordinance 119 by a six-to-two margin, approving its establishment of protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in the city’s nondiscrimination law, and making Fayetteville the first town in the state to extend such protections to LGBT individuals. Six months later, the law was invalidated. The Arkansas General Assembly preempted Fayetteville’s legislation, making it outside of the city’s authority as a municipality to create protected classes beyond those that exist at the state level. Arkansas state law does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity.
我们不是盲目的:《城市非歧视法》的设立条款与宗教动机的国家优先权
2019年8月19日,阿肯色州费耶特维尔市议会举行了10个小时的会议。一百多名市民排队分享他们对第119号条例的看法,这项拟议的条例已成为该镇公众争论的焦点。直到他们都发言后,会议才于凌晨3:30休会。市议会随后以六比二的优势通过了第119号法令,批准在该市的非歧视法中建立基于性取向和性别认同的保护,并使费耶特维尔成为该州第一个将此类保护扩大到LGBT个人的城镇。六个月后,该法律宣告无效。阿肯色州议会抢先通过了费耶特维尔的立法,使其脱离了该市作为市政当局的权限,在州一级之外创建受保护的阶级。阿肯色州法律不保护性取向和性别认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信