Evaluation of the Differences between Normal and Cancerous Prostate Tissue Response to Simple and Vibro-Neural Stimulation

S. Zein, Farhad Tabatabai Ghomsheh, H. Jamshidian
{"title":"Evaluation of the Differences between Normal and Cancerous Prostate Tissue Response to Simple and Vibro-Neural Stimulation","authors":"S. Zein, Farhad Tabatabai Ghomsheh, H. Jamshidian","doi":"10.34172/ICNJ.2020.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Early detection of prostate cancer has significant benefits for its treatment and can increase the survival chance in patients. In recent years, new methods such as shear wave elastography and vibro-elastography, as well as artificial tactile sensing, have been used to detect a mass in the prostate tissue in-vivo and ex-vivo. This paper aims to investigate the difference between normal and malignant prostate tissue reaction to simple and vibro-neural stimulation for prostate tissue mass detection in order to determine neural stimulation intensity, velocity, and frequency to obtain the best result in detecting the type and location of the tumor. Methods : This study has utilized neural stimulation devices in normal and cancerous tissues. The stimulation velocity, probe location, and the frequency of neural stimulation considered as the independent variables. Results : The results show that for superficial masses, although dependent on the probe, the accuracy of detection at the low speed of 5mm/s is 50% higher than other conditions. On the other hand, in deep masses, with increasing mass depth, the accuracy of detection at the medium speed of 8mm/s is 30% higher than the low speed. Finally, the results showed that with increased stimulation frequency, the possibility of tumor detection, and its accuracy increases by 35%. Conclusion : By improving the accuracy of the neural stimulation device, it can apply to detect hard materials such as tumors and malignant tissues.","PeriodicalId":33222,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"61-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ICNJ.2020.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Early detection of prostate cancer has significant benefits for its treatment and can increase the survival chance in patients. In recent years, new methods such as shear wave elastography and vibro-elastography, as well as artificial tactile sensing, have been used to detect a mass in the prostate tissue in-vivo and ex-vivo. This paper aims to investigate the difference between normal and malignant prostate tissue reaction to simple and vibro-neural stimulation for prostate tissue mass detection in order to determine neural stimulation intensity, velocity, and frequency to obtain the best result in detecting the type and location of the tumor. Methods : This study has utilized neural stimulation devices in normal and cancerous tissues. The stimulation velocity, probe location, and the frequency of neural stimulation considered as the independent variables. Results : The results show that for superficial masses, although dependent on the probe, the accuracy of detection at the low speed of 5mm/s is 50% higher than other conditions. On the other hand, in deep masses, with increasing mass depth, the accuracy of detection at the medium speed of 8mm/s is 30% higher than the low speed. Finally, the results showed that with increased stimulation frequency, the possibility of tumor detection, and its accuracy increases by 35%. Conclusion : By improving the accuracy of the neural stimulation device, it can apply to detect hard materials such as tumors and malignant tissues.
正常和癌性前列腺组织对简单和振动神经刺激反应的差异评估
背景:早期发现癌症对其治疗有显著益处,并可增加患者的生存机会。近年来,剪切波弹性成像、振动弹性成像以及人工触觉传感等新方法已被用于体内和体外检测前列腺组织中的肿块。本文旨在研究前列腺组织肿块检测中正常和恶性前列腺组织对简单和振动神经刺激的反应之间的差异,以确定神经刺激的强度、速度和频率,从而在检测肿瘤类型和位置方面获得最佳结果。方法:本研究在正常和癌组织中使用神经刺激装置。刺激速度、探头位置和神经刺激频率被视为自变量。结果:对于浅表肿块,虽然依赖于探头,但在5mm/s的低速下检测的准确率比其他条件高50%。另一方面,在深质量中,随着质量深度的增加,在8mm/s的中速下的检测精度比低速高30%。最后,结果表明,随着刺激频率的增加,肿瘤检测的可能性和准确性提高了35%。结论:通过提高神经刺激装置的准确性,它可以应用于肿瘤和恶性组织等硬物质的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信