Autumn Watson, Eva Purkey, C. Davison, Minnie Fu, Dionne Nolan, D. Mitchell, Jennifer Kehoe, Sheldon Traviss, I. Bayoumi
{"title":"Indigenous Strength: Braiding Culture, Ceremony and Community as a response to the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Autumn Watson, Eva Purkey, C. Davison, Minnie Fu, Dionne Nolan, D. Mitchell, Jennifer Kehoe, Sheldon Traviss, I. Bayoumi","doi":"10.32799/ijih.v17i1.36716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual health of urban Indigenous Peoples. We sought to examine innovations and changes in service delivery by Indigenous service providers in the community who are addressing community needs based on an Indigenous worldview. \nBasic Procedures: The research was a collaboration between an academic team, an Indigenous research associate, and an Indigenous oversight committee. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with Indigenous service organizations, non-Indigenous organizations with Indigenous programming, Indigenous volunteer-based organizations and Indigenous volunteers. Participants were recruited based on having mandates that focussed on mental and emotional wellbeing, education, chronic health conditions, women and children and Indigenous cultural needs. \nMajor Findings: Health inequities for urban Indigenous Peoples were compounded during the pandemic. The lack of local infrastructure contributed to increased volunteerism to deliver and improve access to services. Service interruptions and access barriers triggered innovative programming and a strengths-based response with activities embedded on the land, braided with language, ceremony and culture. Unmet community service needs and capacity development priorities were identified. \nConclusions: Access to land, infrastructure and cultural programming is key to wholistic health for the urban Indigenous community. Despite continued inequities, the urban-based Indigenous response exemplifies the strengths-based approaches that helped to address pandemic impacts and demonstrated how Indigenous ways of knowing build strength and foster innovative program adaptations based on culture, ceremony and creating space for community.","PeriodicalId":54163,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32799/ijih.v17i1.36716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual health of urban Indigenous Peoples. We sought to examine innovations and changes in service delivery by Indigenous service providers in the community who are addressing community needs based on an Indigenous worldview.
Basic Procedures: The research was a collaboration between an academic team, an Indigenous research associate, and an Indigenous oversight committee. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with Indigenous service organizations, non-Indigenous organizations with Indigenous programming, Indigenous volunteer-based organizations and Indigenous volunteers. Participants were recruited based on having mandates that focussed on mental and emotional wellbeing, education, chronic health conditions, women and children and Indigenous cultural needs.
Major Findings: Health inequities for urban Indigenous Peoples were compounded during the pandemic. The lack of local infrastructure contributed to increased volunteerism to deliver and improve access to services. Service interruptions and access barriers triggered innovative programming and a strengths-based response with activities embedded on the land, braided with language, ceremony and culture. Unmet community service needs and capacity development priorities were identified.
Conclusions: Access to land, infrastructure and cultural programming is key to wholistic health for the urban Indigenous community. Despite continued inequities, the urban-based Indigenous response exemplifies the strengths-based approaches that helped to address pandemic impacts and demonstrated how Indigenous ways of knowing build strength and foster innovative program adaptations based on culture, ceremony and creating space for community.