Social Attitude Towards COVID-19 Vaccine 1 Year After The Pandemic

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Y. Durduran, Nazlım Aktug-Demir, Lutfi Saltuk Demir, B. Kandemir, I. Duman, Mehtap Yücel
{"title":"Social Attitude Towards COVID-19 Vaccine 1 Year After The Pandemic","authors":"Y. Durduran, Nazlım Aktug-Demir, Lutfi Saltuk Demir, B. Kandemir, I. Duman, Mehtap Yücel","doi":"10.36519/kd.2022.4208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To increase vaccine awareness, we aimed to determine individuals’ knowledge and behavioral approach to the COVID-19 vaccine.\n\nMethods: The data of this cross-sectional study were obtained online between June and July 31, 2021. One thousand one hundred seventy-six people over the age of 18 were included in the study. The researchers developed a data collection form consisting of 27 questions. Mean±standard deviation and median (1st quarter-3rd quarter) values, numbers, and percentages were used to summarize the data. Chi-square (χ2) test was used to show the relationship between categorical variables. Independent predictors of participants’ vaccine hesitancy/rejection were analyzed using logistic regression. Statistically, data with p<0.05 were considered significant.\n\nResults: A total of 1176 people, 55.7% of whom were women, with a mean age of 39.75±11.27 years, were included in the study. 71.6% of the participants were married, and 78.9% had a university/postgraduate degree. 9.7% of the participants stated that they were hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine, and 7.1% refused the COVID-19 vaccine or would not be vaccinated when it was their turn. According to the logistic regression model established to examine the factors that may affect vaccine rejection; Age, the resources used to obtain information about the vaccine, the thought that it would not protect for two years, or the vaccine side effects were high, and the most effective way to get rid of the pandemic was not vaccination, were determined as the factors affecting vaccine rejection.\n\nConclusion: As a result of the research, it was found that the participants had a positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine. It was determined that 9.7% of the study group had vaccine hesitancy, and 7.1% had vaccine rejection.\n\nKeywords: Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine rejection, COVID-19 vaccines","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/kd.2022.4208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To increase vaccine awareness, we aimed to determine individuals’ knowledge and behavioral approach to the COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: The data of this cross-sectional study were obtained online between June and July 31, 2021. One thousand one hundred seventy-six people over the age of 18 were included in the study. The researchers developed a data collection form consisting of 27 questions. Mean±standard deviation and median (1st quarter-3rd quarter) values, numbers, and percentages were used to summarize the data. Chi-square (χ2) test was used to show the relationship between categorical variables. Independent predictors of participants’ vaccine hesitancy/rejection were analyzed using logistic regression. Statistically, data with p<0.05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 1176 people, 55.7% of whom were women, with a mean age of 39.75±11.27 years, were included in the study. 71.6% of the participants were married, and 78.9% had a university/postgraduate degree. 9.7% of the participants stated that they were hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine, and 7.1% refused the COVID-19 vaccine or would not be vaccinated when it was their turn. According to the logistic regression model established to examine the factors that may affect vaccine rejection; Age, the resources used to obtain information about the vaccine, the thought that it would not protect for two years, or the vaccine side effects were high, and the most effective way to get rid of the pandemic was not vaccination, were determined as the factors affecting vaccine rejection. Conclusion: As a result of the research, it was found that the participants had a positive attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine. It was determined that 9.7% of the study group had vaccine hesitancy, and 7.1% had vaccine rejection. Keywords: Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine rejection, COVID-19 vaccines
大流行一年后,社会对COVID-19疫苗的态度
目的:为了提高疫苗意识,我们旨在确定个体对新冠肺炎疫苗的知识和行为方法。方法:这项横断面研究的数据是在2021年6月至7月31日期间在线获得的。一千一百七十六名18岁以上的人被纳入了这项研究。研究人员开发了一个由27个问题组成的数据收集表。使用平均值±标准差和中位数(第一季度至第三季度)值、数字和百分比来总结数据。χ2检验用于显示分类变量之间的关系。使用逻辑回归分析参与者疫苗犹豫/排斥的独立预测因素。统计学上,p<0.05的数据被认为是显著的。结果:共有1176人被纳入研究,其中55.7%为女性,平均年龄为39.75±11.27岁。71.6%的参与者已婚,78.9%拥有大学/研究生学历。9.7%的参与者表示,他们对新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫不决,7.1%的参与者拒绝接种新冠肺炎疫苗或在轮到他们时不会接种。根据建立的逻辑回归模型来检验可能影响疫苗排斥反应的因素;年龄、用于获取疫苗信息的资源、认为疫苗在两年内不会起保护作用或疫苗副作用很高,以及摆脱疫情的最有效方法不是接种疫苗,都被确定为影响疫苗排斥的因素。结论:研究结果表明,参与者对新冠肺炎疫苗持积极态度。经确定,9.7%的研究组对疫苗犹豫不决,7.1%的研究小组对疫苗有排斥反应。关键词:疫苗犹豫、疫苗排斥、新冠肺炎疫苗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信