Development of a frailty scale for elderly people in China

Xiao-Hong Zhang, Yang Yang, Chun-Mei Zhang, Ru-Zhen Luo, Yan-Hui Liu
{"title":"Development of a frailty scale for elderly people in China","authors":"Xiao-Hong Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Chun-Mei Zhang,&nbsp;Ru-Zhen Luo,&nbsp;Yan-Hui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2017.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to develop a frailty scale for the elderly in China and to examine its reliability and validity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The method of convenient sampling was used to select 375 elderly individuals in different communities of Tianjin, China. EuroQol-5D was used to evaluate the criterion validity. Cronbach's <em>α</em> coefficients, correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, 30 old people were re-evaluated after 2 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The final version of the frailty scale (FI-35) consisted of 35 items. Eleven factors were extracted by a principal factor analysis and varimax rotation, with a cumulative contribution of 86.00%. Eleven dimensions were positively correlated (<em>r</em> = 0.130–0.541, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Cronbach's <em>α</em> coefficient was 0.952, and the alpha coefficients of 11 dimensions ranged from 0.730 to 0.992. The test–retest reliability was 0.874 for the total scale. The split-half reliability of the scale was 0.808. Structural equation modeling was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis, and various parameters were all acceptable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FI-35 met the requirement of scale development and showed good reliability and validity; thus, it can be used as an efficient frailty measurement tool for Chinese elderly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 64-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.06.003","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771817300324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a frailty scale for the elderly in China and to examine its reliability and validity.

Methods

The method of convenient sampling was used to select 375 elderly individuals in different communities of Tianjin, China. EuroQol-5D was used to evaluate the criterion validity. Cronbach's α coefficients, correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. To evaluate the test–retest reliability, 30 old people were re-evaluated after 2 weeks.

Results

The final version of the frailty scale (FI-35) consisted of 35 items. Eleven factors were extracted by a principal factor analysis and varimax rotation, with a cumulative contribution of 86.00%. Eleven dimensions were positively correlated (r = 0.130–0.541, P < 0.01). Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.952, and the alpha coefficients of 11 dimensions ranged from 0.730 to 0.992. The test–retest reliability was 0.874 for the total scale. The split-half reliability of the scale was 0.808. Structural equation modeling was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis, and various parameters were all acceptable.

Conclusions

FI-35 met the requirement of scale development and showed good reliability and validity; thus, it can be used as an efficient frailty measurement tool for Chinese elderly.

中国老年人体质虚弱量表的编制
目的编制中国老年人虚弱量表,并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法采用方便抽样法对天津市不同社区的375名老年人进行调查。采用EuroQol-5D评价标准效度。采用Cronbach’s α系数、相关分析、探索性因子分析、标准相关效度和内部一致性评价量表的信度和效度。为评估重测信度,30例老年人于2周后进行重测。结果终版虚弱量表(FI-35)由35个项目组成。通过主因子分析和方差旋转提取了11个因子,累积贡献率为86.00%。11个维度呈正相关(r = 0.130 ~ 0.541, P <0.01)。Cronbach’s α系数为0.952,11个维度的α系数为0.730 ~ 0.992。总量表的重测信度为0.874。量表的分半信度为0.808。采用结构方程模型进行验证性因子分析,各参数均可接受。结论fi -35符合量表编制要求,具有良好的信效度;因此,它可以作为一种有效的中国老年人虚弱度测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信