Book Review: The Unequal Pandemic Covid-19 and Health Inequalities by Clare Bambra, Julia Lynch and Katherine E. Smith

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Ambreen Yousuf
{"title":"Book Review: The Unequal Pandemic Covid-19 and Health Inequalities by Clare Bambra, Julia Lynch and Katherine E. Smith","authors":"Ambreen Yousuf","doi":"10.1177/13882627221092464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Socio-political circumstances combined with economic inequalities have historically been part of pandemics such as the influenza, or Spanish flu, pandemic of 1918, the N1H1 outbreak of 2009, and the Covid-19 pandemic of 2019. Using historical data, Bambra, Lynch, and Smith examine to what extent previous public health emergencies and the current Covid-19 crisis have impacted different spectrums of society. Questioning the way various governments approached the lockdown, the authors argue that the Covid-19 pandemic further widened the gap between the rich and the poor. For instance, in India, the sudden announcement of lockdown led to the mass migration of poor migrant workers. What is remarkable about this work is that the authors have focused on the plight of the disadvantaged sections of society, who were the biggest victims of this global pandemic. It would be pertinent to mention here that the Covid-19 pandemic struck when many countries were already facing political and economic backsliding. The book consists of six chapters. Each chapter explores how the Covid-19 pandemic turned everyday life upside down, particularly that of the marginalised communities. Interestingly, the book shows glaring differences in how various governments made ‘varying efforts’ to control and manage the pandemic. For instance, New Zealand took strict and effective measures and closed their borders while Sweden took a more laissez-faire approach, merely restricting public gatherings. During the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, Australia, South Korea, and Germany took health surveillance measures like contact tracing and introduced individual quarantine to control the spread of the virus. The Covid-19 pandemic acts as an ‘unequal contagion’, which, according to the authors, discriminates differently by posing huge risks to some sections and fewer risks to other sections depending upon their social and economic background. By arguing so, however, the authors also recognise the vulnerability of the masses to the Covid virus, irrespective of their political and economic status. The Unequal Pandemic seeks to argue that the Covid-19 pandemic is unequal in four broad ways: it is killing unequally, it is being experienced unequally, it is impoverishing unequally, and its inequalities are political. Explaining massive mortality rates among the weaker sections of the society, the authors focus on the bigger picture of how pre-existing inequalities based on social, ethnic, occupational, intersectional, and geographical inequalities have worsened the impact of Covid-19 on certain sections of society. Book Review","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627221092464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socio-political circumstances combined with economic inequalities have historically been part of pandemics such as the influenza, or Spanish flu, pandemic of 1918, the N1H1 outbreak of 2009, and the Covid-19 pandemic of 2019. Using historical data, Bambra, Lynch, and Smith examine to what extent previous public health emergencies and the current Covid-19 crisis have impacted different spectrums of society. Questioning the way various governments approached the lockdown, the authors argue that the Covid-19 pandemic further widened the gap between the rich and the poor. For instance, in India, the sudden announcement of lockdown led to the mass migration of poor migrant workers. What is remarkable about this work is that the authors have focused on the plight of the disadvantaged sections of society, who were the biggest victims of this global pandemic. It would be pertinent to mention here that the Covid-19 pandemic struck when many countries were already facing political and economic backsliding. The book consists of six chapters. Each chapter explores how the Covid-19 pandemic turned everyday life upside down, particularly that of the marginalised communities. Interestingly, the book shows glaring differences in how various governments made ‘varying efforts’ to control and manage the pandemic. For instance, New Zealand took strict and effective measures and closed their borders while Sweden took a more laissez-faire approach, merely restricting public gatherings. During the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, Australia, South Korea, and Germany took health surveillance measures like contact tracing and introduced individual quarantine to control the spread of the virus. The Covid-19 pandemic acts as an ‘unequal contagion’, which, according to the authors, discriminates differently by posing huge risks to some sections and fewer risks to other sections depending upon their social and economic background. By arguing so, however, the authors also recognise the vulnerability of the masses to the Covid virus, irrespective of their political and economic status. The Unequal Pandemic seeks to argue that the Covid-19 pandemic is unequal in four broad ways: it is killing unequally, it is being experienced unequally, it is impoverishing unequally, and its inequalities are political. Explaining massive mortality rates among the weaker sections of the society, the authors focus on the bigger picture of how pre-existing inequalities based on social, ethnic, occupational, intersectional, and geographical inequalities have worsened the impact of Covid-19 on certain sections of society. Book Review
书评:克莱尔·班布拉、朱莉娅·林奇和凯瑟琳·e·史密斯的《不平等的大流行Covid-19和健康不平等》
历史上,社会政治环境与经济不平等的结合是流感(或西班牙流感)、1918年流感大流行、2009年甲型h1n1流感大流行和2019年Covid-19大流行等大流行的一部分。班布拉、林奇和史密斯利用历史数据,研究了以前的公共卫生突发事件和当前的Covid-19危机在多大程度上影响了社会的不同领域。作者质疑各国政府应对封锁的方式,认为新冠肺炎大流行进一步扩大了贫富差距。例如,在印度,突然宣布封锁导致贫困农民工大规模迁移。这项工作的非凡之处在于,作者关注的是社会弱势群体的困境,他们是这场全球流行病的最大受害者。值得一提的是,新冠肺炎疫情发生时,许多国家的政治和经济已经出现倒退。这本书由六章组成。每一章都探讨了Covid-19大流行如何使日常生活,特别是边缘化社区的日常生活发生翻天覆地的变化。有趣的是,这本书显示了各国政府在控制和管理疫情方面所做的“不同努力”的明显差异。例如,新西兰采取了严格有效的措施,关闭了边境,而瑞典则采取了更加自由放任的方式,只是限制公众集会。在新冠肺炎大流行初期,澳大利亚、韩国和德国采取了追踪接触者和个人隔离等健康监测措施,控制了病毒的传播。作者认为,Covid-19大流行是一种“不平等传染”,根据社会和经济背景的不同,它对某些群体构成巨大风险,对其他群体构成较小风险,从而产生不同的歧视。然而,通过这样的论证,作者也承认了大众对新冠病毒的脆弱性,无论他们的政治和经济地位如何。《不平等大流行》试图论证,新冠肺炎大流行在四个方面是不平等的:它造成不平等的死亡,不平等的经历,不平等的贫困,以及它的不平等是政治的。在解释社会弱势群体的高死亡率时,作者关注的是更大的图景,即基于社会、种族、职业、交叉和地理不平等的预先存在的不平等如何加剧了Covid-19对社会某些阶层的影响。书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信