Metric and non-metric guides for the determination between fore- and hindlimb phalanges of Rangifer tarandus

Rangifer Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.7557/2.39.1.4630
Emily Hull
{"title":"Metric and non-metric guides for the determination between fore- and hindlimb phalanges of Rangifer tarandus","authors":"Emily Hull","doi":"10.7557/2.39.1.4630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phalanges are a great untapped resource in the zooarchaeology of Rangifer tarandus. The utilization of this resource, however, is constrained by a current inability to consistently differentiate fore- from hindlimb phalanges in a mixed assemblage. The ability to separate and identify forelimb and hindlimb phalanx 1 (PI) and phalanx 2 (PII), as well as to recognize and identify other small bones of the hoof, leads to great opportunities for archaeologists. In large scale-analysis, this capacity allows a greater ability to determine minimum number of individuals and assess butchery and transport practices. In the examination of individual life histories of Rangifer tarandus, these designations allow a more precise study of pathology and entheseal change, which can shed light on adaptation, foraging strategy, and human-animal interactions. This study presents qualitative and quantitative methods for the differentiation of PI and PII of the fore- and hindlimbs and describes other bones of the hoof. Metric techniques were developed to differentiate fore- from hindlimb phalanges using non-invasive, non-destructive, and simple methods. The efficacy and accuracy of these methods were assessed using blind testing by students and staff. The average success rates of metric analysis yielded 87% accuracy for determinations of fore- versus hindlimb PI and 92% accuracy for determination of fore- versus hindlimb PII. These results show that this method could benefit researchers working with Rangifer tarandus remains.","PeriodicalId":30034,"journal":{"name":"Rangifer","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangifer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7557/2.39.1.4630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Phalanges are a great untapped resource in the zooarchaeology of Rangifer tarandus. The utilization of this resource, however, is constrained by a current inability to consistently differentiate fore- from hindlimb phalanges in a mixed assemblage. The ability to separate and identify forelimb and hindlimb phalanx 1 (PI) and phalanx 2 (PII), as well as to recognize and identify other small bones of the hoof, leads to great opportunities for archaeologists. In large scale-analysis, this capacity allows a greater ability to determine minimum number of individuals and assess butchery and transport practices. In the examination of individual life histories of Rangifer tarandus, these designations allow a more precise study of pathology and entheseal change, which can shed light on adaptation, foraging strategy, and human-animal interactions. This study presents qualitative and quantitative methods for the differentiation of PI and PII of the fore- and hindlimbs and describes other bones of the hoof. Metric techniques were developed to differentiate fore- from hindlimb phalanges using non-invasive, non-destructive, and simple methods. The efficacy and accuracy of these methods were assessed using blind testing by students and staff. The average success rates of metric analysis yielded 87% accuracy for determinations of fore- versus hindlimb PI and 92% accuracy for determination of fore- versus hindlimb PII. These results show that this method could benefit researchers working with Rangifer tarandus remains.
测定狼蛛前肢和后肢指骨的公制和非公制指南
在塔兰多斯蛙的动物考古中,Phalanges是一种尚未开发的巨大资源。然而,这种资源的利用受到目前无法在混合组合中一致区分前肢指骨和后肢指骨的限制。分离和识别前肢和后肢指骨1(PI)和指骨2(PII)的能力,以及识别和识别蹄的其他小骨头的能力,为考古学家带来了巨大的机会。在大规模分析中,这种能力允许更大的能力来确定最小数量的个体,并评估屠宰和运输实践。在对狼蛛个体生活史的研究中,这些命名可以更精确地研究病理学和触角的变化,从而揭示适应、觅食策略和人与动物的相互作用。本研究提出了定性和定量的方法来区分前肢和后肢的PI和PII,并描述了蹄的其他骨骼。测量技术被开发出来,使用非侵入性、非破坏性和简单的方法来区分前肢指骨和后肢指骨。这些方法的有效性和准确性通过学生和工作人员的盲测进行评估。度量分析的平均成功率在确定前肢与后肢PI时产生了87%的准确率,在确定前腿与后肢PII时产生了92%的准确率。这些结果表明,这种方法可以使研究Rangifer tarandus遗骸的研究人员受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信