Endovascular invasions for femoral-popliteal segment disorders of C andD-type according to TASC-II classification

O. Nikishin, M. Muz, A. I. Gavretskiy, I. Altman, S. I. Savoluk
{"title":"Endovascular invasions for femoral-popliteal segment disorders of C andD-type according to TASC-II classification","authors":"O. Nikishin, M. Muz, A. I. Gavretskiy, I. Altman, S. I. Savoluk","doi":"10.26683/2304-9359-2018-2(24)-69-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, direct re-vascularization for the management of critical limb ischemia (CLI) is effectuated through open and hybrid surgical treatments. At the same time, therapeutic recommendations for one of the methods appear as a subject of lasting discussions. Today TASC II (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease) adopted in 2007 is the most popular document that provides justifications for endovascular and surgical treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Clinical practice provides evidence that there is a significant number of patients having critical limb ischemia who suffer from vascular bed disorders and are classified as C or D-type according to TASC classification. Meanwhile, there also are cases when these patients have no other alternative than re-vascularization by means of open surgery, which is why endovascular invasion appears as the only method of re-vascularization for them. The article presents some results of comparative studies within endovascular and surgical tools aimed at revascularization in the area of femoral-popliteal segment, including cases where patients are classified as C and D-type. The results of shunting operations are compared to angioplasty and remote endarterectomy, whereas technical methods for re-entry during subintimal angioplasty are regarded apart. Despite the fact that there are medical recommendations for the use of endovascular and surgical methods depending on TASC II classification, today there is no evidence that these tools can be efficient in revascularization of femoral-popliteal segment. In order to identify the efficiency of distinct methods in revascularization of femoral-popliteal segment there a need in a number of extended randomized studies designed to evaluate the role of such factors, as anatomic location of the vascular bed disorder, the extent of a disease, the location of purolo-necrotic areas as well as other pathologies on the results of the study.","PeriodicalId":33226,"journal":{"name":"Endovaskuliarna neirorentgenokhirurgiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endovaskuliarna neirorentgenokhirurgiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26683/2304-9359-2018-2(24)-69-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, direct re-vascularization for the management of critical limb ischemia (CLI) is effectuated through open and hybrid surgical treatments. At the same time, therapeutic recommendations for one of the methods appear as a subject of lasting discussions. Today TASC II (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease) adopted in 2007 is the most popular document that provides justifications for endovascular and surgical treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Clinical practice provides evidence that there is a significant number of patients having critical limb ischemia who suffer from vascular bed disorders and are classified as C or D-type according to TASC classification. Meanwhile, there also are cases when these patients have no other alternative than re-vascularization by means of open surgery, which is why endovascular invasion appears as the only method of re-vascularization for them. The article presents some results of comparative studies within endovascular and surgical tools aimed at revascularization in the area of femoral-popliteal segment, including cases where patients are classified as C and D-type. The results of shunting operations are compared to angioplasty and remote endarterectomy, whereas technical methods for re-entry during subintimal angioplasty are regarded apart. Despite the fact that there are medical recommendations for the use of endovascular and surgical methods depending on TASC II classification, today there is no evidence that these tools can be efficient in revascularization of femoral-popliteal segment. In order to identify the efficiency of distinct methods in revascularization of femoral-popliteal segment there a need in a number of extended randomized studies designed to evaluate the role of such factors, as anatomic location of the vascular bed disorder, the extent of a disease, the location of purolo-necrotic areas as well as other pathologies on the results of the study.
根据TASC-II分类的C型和d型股腘段疾病的血管内侵入
目前,直接血管重建治疗严重肢体缺血(CLI)是通过开放和混合手术治疗来实现的。与此同时,其中一种方法的治疗建议似乎是一个持久讨论的主题。今天,2007年通过的TASC II(跨大西洋外周动脉疾病管理的跨协会共识)是最受欢迎的文件,为外周动脉疾病的血管内和手术治疗提供了理由。临床实践证明,有相当数量的危重肢体缺血患者伴有血管床疾病,根据TASC分类可分为C型或d型。同时,也有一些患者只能通过开放手术进行血管重建,这就是为什么血管内侵入成为他们唯一的血管重建方法。本文介绍了一些针对股腘段血管内重建和手术工具的比较研究结果,包括C型和d型患者的病例。分流手术的结果与血管成形术和远程动脉内膜切除术进行了比较,而内膜下血管成形术中的再入技术方法则被认为是不同的。尽管根据TASC II的分类,医学上推荐使用血管内和手术方法,但目前没有证据表明这些工具在股腘段血运重建术中是有效的。为了确定不同方法在股腘段血运重建中的效率,需要进行大量扩展的随机研究,旨在评估这些因素的作用,如血管床紊乱的解剖位置、疾病的程度、脓坏死区域的位置以及其他病理学对研究结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信