Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates

Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1075/MSW.17027.LAV
K. Y. R. D. Lavalette, C. Andone, G. Steen
{"title":"Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates","authors":"K. Y. R. D. Lavalette, C. Andone, G. Steen","doi":"10.1075/MSW.17027.LAV","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper studies metaphor use in British Public Bill Committee debates. It focuses on the way in which\n legislators frame their arguments in metaphorical terms under the form of figurative analogies. Because these figurative analogies\n can be misleading by oversimplifying the issue under discussion, resisting them by putting forward counter-argumentation is a\n crucial and necessary skill. The purpose of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of countering figurative analogies in\n legislative debates, and to show that resistance to figurative analogies is a complex phenomenon comprising various types of\n criticisms to different types of metaphor. To this end, we present qualitative analyses of a number of case studies of resistance\n to figurative analogies found in the British Public Bill Committee debates on the Education Bill 2010–11 by employing the\n three-dimensional model of metaphor (Steen, 2011) and the pragma-dialectical theory of\n argumentation (Van Eemeren, 2010).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/MSW.17027.LAV","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper studies metaphor use in British Public Bill Committee debates. It focuses on the way in which legislators frame their arguments in metaphorical terms under the form of figurative analogies. Because these figurative analogies can be misleading by oversimplifying the issue under discussion, resisting them by putting forward counter-argumentation is a crucial and necessary skill. The purpose of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of countering figurative analogies in legislative debates, and to show that resistance to figurative analogies is a complex phenomenon comprising various types of criticisms to different types of metaphor. To this end, we present qualitative analyses of a number of case studies of resistance to figurative analogies found in the British Public Bill Committee debates on the Education Bill 2010–11 by employing the three-dimensional model of metaphor (Steen, 2011) and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation (Van Eemeren, 2010).
分享
查看原文
比喻的类比,以及它们在英国公共法案委员会辩论中是如何被抵制的
本文研究了隐喻在英国公共法案委员会辩论中的使用。它侧重于立法者在比喻类比的形式下以隐喻的方式构建他们的论点的方式。因为这些比喻性的类比可能会因过度简化讨论中的问题而产生误导,所以通过提出反论证来抵制它们是一项至关重要和必要的技能。本文的目的是探讨立法辩论中反对比喻类比的现象,并表明对比喻类比的抵制是一个复杂的现象,包括对不同类型隐喻的各种批评。为此,我们采用隐喻的三维模型(Steen, 2011)和论证的语用辩证理论(Van Eemeren, 2010),对英国公共法案委员会在2010 - 11年教育法案辩论中发现的一些抵制比喻类比的案例研究进行了定性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信