{"title":"The ANTARA and TEMPO Media’s Framing Strategy Differences in Framing the Omnibus Law Ratification Issue","authors":"R. Rahmi, Sawirman Sawirman, Aslinda Aslinda","doi":"10.26499/rnh.v10i2.4146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research, the authors compared the framing strategy used by the ANTARA media and TEMPO media for the issue of the ratification of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation. This research was conducted descriptively with comparative qualitative approach. A qualitative document procedure was applied in collecting the data. Fairclough's framework of Critical Discourse Analysis and the framing analysis model by Pan and Kosicki (1993) were combined to analyze the data. The result of the data analysis is presented in the table and the interpretation form. The result shows that TEMPO's framing strategy is more clearly defined, while ANTARA's strategy is less clear. In building a negative or positive representation, TEMPO Media tries to present information supported by many sources. Then, the use of images in TEMPO news supports the truth of information, while the use of images in ANTARA media improves the quality of information sources. The five news stories from ANTARA media selected in this study always use the face image of the selected informant as a source of news information. AbstrakPada penelitian ini, penulis membandingkan strategi pembingkaian yang digunakan media ANTARA dan TEMPO dalam membingkai isu pengesahan Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara deskriptif dengan pendekatan komparatif kualitiatif. Prosedur dokumen kualitatif diterapkan dalam pengumpulan data. Kerangka analisis wacana kritis Fairclough dan model analisis pembingkaian oleh Pan dan Kosicki (1993) digabungkan untuk menganalisis data. Hasil analisis data disajikan dalam bentuk tabel dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi pembingkaian TEMPO lebih jelas, sedangkan strategi ANTARA kurang jelas. Dalam membangun representasi negatif atau positif, TEMPO mencoba menghadirkan informasi yang didukung oleh banyak sumber. Kemudian, penggunaan gambar dalam berita TEMPO mendukung kebenaran informasi, sedangkan penggunaan gambar di media ANTARA meningkatkan kualitas sumber informasi. Kelima berita dari media ANTARA yang dipilih dalam penelitian ini selalu menggunakan foto sumber informasi yang terpilih pada berita.","PeriodicalId":32409,"journal":{"name":"Ranah Jurnal Kajian Bahasa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ranah Jurnal Kajian Bahasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v10i2.4146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this research, the authors compared the framing strategy used by the ANTARA media and TEMPO media for the issue of the ratification of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation. This research was conducted descriptively with comparative qualitative approach. A qualitative document procedure was applied in collecting the data. Fairclough's framework of Critical Discourse Analysis and the framing analysis model by Pan and Kosicki (1993) were combined to analyze the data. The result of the data analysis is presented in the table and the interpretation form. The result shows that TEMPO's framing strategy is more clearly defined, while ANTARA's strategy is less clear. In building a negative or positive representation, TEMPO Media tries to present information supported by many sources. Then, the use of images in TEMPO news supports the truth of information, while the use of images in ANTARA media improves the quality of information sources. The five news stories from ANTARA media selected in this study always use the face image of the selected informant as a source of news information. AbstrakPada penelitian ini, penulis membandingkan strategi pembingkaian yang digunakan media ANTARA dan TEMPO dalam membingkai isu pengesahan Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara deskriptif dengan pendekatan komparatif kualitiatif. Prosedur dokumen kualitatif diterapkan dalam pengumpulan data. Kerangka analisis wacana kritis Fairclough dan model analisis pembingkaian oleh Pan dan Kosicki (1993) digabungkan untuk menganalisis data. Hasil analisis data disajikan dalam bentuk tabel dan interpretasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi pembingkaian TEMPO lebih jelas, sedangkan strategi ANTARA kurang jelas. Dalam membangun representasi negatif atau positif, TEMPO mencoba menghadirkan informasi yang didukung oleh banyak sumber. Kemudian, penggunaan gambar dalam berita TEMPO mendukung kebenaran informasi, sedangkan penggunaan gambar di media ANTARA meningkatkan kualitas sumber informasi. Kelima berita dari media ANTARA yang dipilih dalam penelitian ini selalu menggunakan foto sumber informasi yang terpilih pada berita.
在这项研究中,作者比较了[UNK]ANTARA[UNK]媒体和[UNK]TEMPO/UNK]媒体在批准《创造就业综合法》问题上使用的框架策略。本研究采用比较定性的方法进行描述性研究。在收集数据时采用了定性文件程序。将费尔克劳夫的批评语篇分析框架与潘和柯西基(1993)的框架分析模型相结合,对数据进行分析。给出了数据分析的结果在构建消极或积极的表述时,[UNK]TEMPO[UNK]会调解提供许多来源支持的信息。然后,在[UNK]TEMPO[UNK]新闻中使用图像支持信息的真实性,而在[UNK]ANTARA[UNK]媒体中使用图像提高了信息源的质量。在本研究中选择的五篇来自[UNK]ANTARA[UNK]媒体的新闻报道总是使用所选举报人的面部图像作为新闻信息来源。在本研究中,作者比较了ANTARA和TEMPO媒体在讨论Job Created Law Omnibus认证问题时使用的解决策略。本研究采用定性比较法进行描述性研究。数据收集采用质量文件程序。将Fairclough的关键中期分析与Pan和Kosicki(1993)的网络分析模型相结合进行数据分析。数据分析结果以表格和解释形式提供。研究表明,TEMPO的分销策略更加清晰,而ANTARA的分销策略则不明确。在构建否定或肯定的表示时,TEMPO试图呈现由许多来源支持的信息。然后,在TEMPO新闻中使用图像支持信息的真实性,而在ANTARA媒体中使用图像提高了信息源的质量。本研究中选择的五家ANTARA媒体报道总是使用新闻中选定信息来源的照片。