A Closer Look at the Alleged “War on Cops”: Post-Ferguson Trends in Ideologically-Motivated Homicides of Police Officers, 2008–2021

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jesse J. Norris
{"title":"A Closer Look at the Alleged “War on Cops”: Post-Ferguson Trends in Ideologically-Motivated Homicides of Police Officers, 2008–2021","authors":"Jesse J. Norris","doi":"10.1177/10986111231189827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some proponents of the “war on cops” thesis have suggested that the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement encourages people to murder police officers and is responsible for many civilian-on-police homicides. To evaluate such claims, this study examines all homicides of on-duty police officers by civilians from 2008 to 2021 ( n = 595) for ideological motives, and uses interrupted times series analysis to test for post-Ferguson trends. Ideological motivations were present in 12% of civilian-on-police homicides, and only 3% constituted terrorism. Right-wing motivations were far more common (6%) than left-wing motives (3%). Most analyses showed no significant increase in ideological civilian-on-police homicides after Ferguson. Although homicides with left-wing motives unconnected to personal revenge significantly increased after Ferguson, this only accounts for a small proportion of post-Ferguson homicides (4%). In short, there is no evidence that BLM unleashed a “war on cops” in which officers are increasingly targeted in ideological homicides.","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111231189827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some proponents of the “war on cops” thesis have suggested that the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement encourages people to murder police officers and is responsible for many civilian-on-police homicides. To evaluate such claims, this study examines all homicides of on-duty police officers by civilians from 2008 to 2021 ( n = 595) for ideological motives, and uses interrupted times series analysis to test for post-Ferguson trends. Ideological motivations were present in 12% of civilian-on-police homicides, and only 3% constituted terrorism. Right-wing motivations were far more common (6%) than left-wing motives (3%). Most analyses showed no significant increase in ideological civilian-on-police homicides after Ferguson. Although homicides with left-wing motives unconnected to personal revenge significantly increased after Ferguson, this only accounts for a small proportion of post-Ferguson homicides (4%). In short, there is no evidence that BLM unleashed a “war on cops” in which officers are increasingly targeted in ideological homicides.
细看所谓的“对警察的战争”:2008-2011年弗格森时代后出于意识形态动机杀害警察的趋势
一些“向警察宣战”理论的支持者认为,“黑人的命也是命”运动鼓励人们谋杀警察,并对许多平民对警察的谋杀负责。为了评估这些说法,本研究调查了2008年至2021年(n=595)所有平民出于意识形态动机杀害执勤警察的案件,并使用中断时间序列分析来检验后弗格森时代的趋势。12%的平民对警察的凶杀案存在意识形态动机,只有3%构成恐怖主义。右翼动机(6%)远比左翼动机(3%)常见。大多数分析显示,弗格森之后,意识形态上的平民对警察的凶杀案没有显著增加。尽管弗格森之后,与个人复仇无关的左翼动机的凶杀案显著增加,但这只占弗格森之后凶杀案的一小部分(4%)。简言之,没有证据表明土地管理局发动了一场“对警察的战争”,在这场战争中,警察越来越多地成为意识形态谋杀的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信