Development of Forecasting Model for Machine Learning-Based Landfill Leachate Generation Using Linear Interpolation

In-Ha Choi, Kyeong-Hwan Cha, Kyung-Min Kim, Johng-Hwa Ahn
{"title":"Development of Forecasting Model for Machine Learning-Based Landfill Leachate Generation Using Linear Interpolation","authors":"In-Ha Choi, Kyeong-Hwan Cha, Kyung-Min Kim, Johng-Hwa Ahn","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2023.45.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives:The purpose of this study is to compare single models according to the missing value handling techniques for predicting leachate generation.Methods:Input factors such as landfill gas generation, and weather data (precipitation, wind speed, radiation, temperature, and relative humidity) were used from June 2002 to October 2018. Linear interpolation and mean method were used as the missing value handling technique. The experiment was conducted by dividing the data into train and test data according to the optimal ratio. Various single models were used, and the prediction performance of the model was compared and evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2).Results and Discussion:The gated recurrent unit (GRU) model was the best among the single models. In the GRU model, R2 was 0.867 for linear interpolation and R2 was 0.839 for the mean method, so that the GRU model using linear interpolation was most suitable for predicting leachate generation. In the ANN model, R2 of linear interpolation (0.862) was higher than that of mean method (0.828). In the long short-term memory (LSTM) model, R2 was 0.779 for linear interpolation and 0.762 for mean method. In the random forest (RF) model, R2 for linear interpolation (0.700) was also higher than that for the mean method (0.665). The model performance was excellent in the order GRU>ANN>LSTM>RF. The linear interpolation for the missing value handling technique was superior to the mean method in all models used in this experiment.Conclusion:The GRU using linear interpolation was the most suitable model for predicting landfill leachate generation.","PeriodicalId":52756,"journal":{"name":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2023.45.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:The purpose of this study is to compare single models according to the missing value handling techniques for predicting leachate generation.Methods:Input factors such as landfill gas generation, and weather data (precipitation, wind speed, radiation, temperature, and relative humidity) were used from June 2002 to October 2018. Linear interpolation and mean method were used as the missing value handling technique. The experiment was conducted by dividing the data into train and test data according to the optimal ratio. Various single models were used, and the prediction performance of the model was compared and evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2).Results and Discussion:The gated recurrent unit (GRU) model was the best among the single models. In the GRU model, R2 was 0.867 for linear interpolation and R2 was 0.839 for the mean method, so that the GRU model using linear interpolation was most suitable for predicting leachate generation. In the ANN model, R2 of linear interpolation (0.862) was higher than that of mean method (0.828). In the long short-term memory (LSTM) model, R2 was 0.779 for linear interpolation and 0.762 for mean method. In the random forest (RF) model, R2 for linear interpolation (0.700) was also higher than that for the mean method (0.665). The model performance was excellent in the order GRU>ANN>LSTM>RF. The linear interpolation for the missing value handling technique was superior to the mean method in all models used in this experiment.Conclusion:The GRU using linear interpolation was the most suitable model for predicting landfill leachate generation.
基于线性插值的机器学习垃圾渗滤液生成预测模型的建立
目的:本研究的目的是根据缺失值处理技术来比较预测渗滤液生成的单一模型。方法:采用2002年6月至2018年10月的垃圾填埋气体产生等输入因子和气象数据(降水、风速、辐射、温度、相对湿度)。采用线性插值和均值法处理缺失值。将数据按最佳比例分成训练数据和测试数据进行实验。采用多种单一模型,采用决定系数(R2)对模型的预测性能进行比较和评价。结果与讨论:门控循环单元(GRU)模型在单一模型中效果最好。在GRU模型中,线性插值法的R2为0.867,均值法的R2为0.839,因此采用线性插值的GRU模型最适合预测渗滤液生成。在ANN模型中,线性插值法的R2(0.862)高于均值法的R2(0.828)。在长短期记忆(LSTM)模型中,线性插值法的R2为0.779,均值法的R2为0.762。在随机森林(random forest, RF)模型中,线性插值法的R2(0.700)也高于均值法(0.665)。该模型在GRU>ANN>LSTM>RF阶上表现优异。在本实验中使用的所有模型中,线性插值法处理缺失值的效果都优于均值法。结论:线性插值的GRU是预测垃圾渗滤液产生量最合适的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信