Youth perspective on social media discourse on “Lazy Nigerian Youths” conversations

N. Ezeh, A. G. Mboso
{"title":"Youth perspective on social media discourse on “Lazy Nigerian Youths” conversations","authors":"N. Ezeh, A. G. Mboso","doi":"10.21831/informasi.v50i2.31334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Social Media has emerged as a new platform for discourses. It has no doubt provided people with easier and faster accessibility to information and has become an outlet for them to share their views on socio-political issues. It has also been observed that negative and hate comments seem to dominate on social networks used for social and political communication. Anchored on Public Sphere Theory, focus group discussions were conducted with undergraduate youths in South-east Nigeria examined on the issue of President Mohammadu Buhari’s referring to Nigerian youths as lazy, while speaking at the Commonwealth Business Forum in Westminster on 18th April 2018. This article, therefore, explored the opinions advanced in the discourse based on the principles of freedom of expression and responsibility. The study suggests that while Twitter platform was more objective in the discussion of the issue of the day because it allows the use of filters to ensure that contents posted on the platform adhere strictly to rules and fair usage; Facebook and Whatsapp trailed with abuses and hate comments. The study recommended that owners of blogs and media houses who now post their contents on the social media should coordinate comments on such platforms and continue developing mechanisms that work to regulate the quality of posted content.","PeriodicalId":31334,"journal":{"name":"Informasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v50i2.31334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Social Media has emerged as a new platform for discourses. It has no doubt provided people with easier and faster accessibility to information and has become an outlet for them to share their views on socio-political issues. It has also been observed that negative and hate comments seem to dominate on social networks used for social and political communication. Anchored on Public Sphere Theory, focus group discussions were conducted with undergraduate youths in South-east Nigeria examined on the issue of President Mohammadu Buhari’s referring to Nigerian youths as lazy, while speaking at the Commonwealth Business Forum in Westminster on 18th April 2018. This article, therefore, explored the opinions advanced in the discourse based on the principles of freedom of expression and responsibility. The study suggests that while Twitter platform was more objective in the discussion of the issue of the day because it allows the use of filters to ensure that contents posted on the platform adhere strictly to rules and fair usage; Facebook and Whatsapp trailed with abuses and hate comments. The study recommended that owners of blogs and media houses who now post their contents on the social media should coordinate comments on such platforms and continue developing mechanisms that work to regulate the quality of posted content.
“懒惰的尼日利亚青年”对话社交媒体话语中的青年视角
社交媒体已经成为一个新的话语平台。毫无疑问,它为人们提供了更容易、更快的信息获取途径,并成为他们分享社会政治问题观点的渠道。还有人观察到,在用于社交和政治交流的社交网络上,负面和仇恨言论似乎占主导地位。2018年4月18日,在威斯敏斯特举行的英联邦商业论坛上,以公共领域理论为基础,与尼日利亚东南部的大学生青年进行了焦点小组讨论,讨论了穆罕默德·布哈里总统称尼日利亚青年懒惰的问题。因此,本文探讨了基于言论自由和责任原则的话语中提出的观点。研究表明,虽然推特平台在讨论当天的问题时更为客观,因为它允许使用过滤器来确保平台上发布的内容严格遵守规则和公平使用;脸书和Whatsapp充斥着谩骂和仇恨言论。该研究建议,现在在社交媒体上发布内容的博客和媒体公司的所有者应协调此类平台上的评论,并继续开发监管发布内容质量的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信