{"title":"Moving beyond \"the Media\": Critical Intersections between Traditionalization and Mediatization","authors":"Charles L. Briggs","doi":"10.2979/jfolkrese.57.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article attempts to fundamentally reorient research on \"folklore and the media.\" After reviewing a number of ways this topic has been addressed, this article reconceptualizes what has been framed as the relationship between folklore and the media through notions of traditionalization and mediatization. Doing so suggests how folkloristics and media studies have moved in parallel ways in questioning com-monsense definitions of core disciplinary concepts and in examining how folkloric and mediatized subjects and objects are produced. Two examples scrutinize these processes from opposite directions: A reexamination of the Kinder-und Hausmärchen analyzes the Brothers Grimm's methods not in terms of their ability to mirror features of oral narratives but as creating authoritative practices for mediatizing tradition. The second examines how public health officials, medical researchers, epidemiologists, journalists, and laypersons collaborated in producing the \"swine flu pandemic\" narrative in just twenty-four hours in 2009. While the Grimms made traditionalization and mediatization seem to go together hand-in-glove, the H1N1 virus was mediatized as new, even as the narrative was traditionalized. The conclusion points to the productivity of rejecting reified notions of folklore and \"the media\" in favor of examining particular ways that traditionalization and mediatization intersect, both as analytic tools and as real-world processes.","PeriodicalId":44620,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH","volume":"57 1","pages":"117 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FOLKLORE RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfolkrese.57.2.03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Abstract:This article attempts to fundamentally reorient research on "folklore and the media." After reviewing a number of ways this topic has been addressed, this article reconceptualizes what has been framed as the relationship between folklore and the media through notions of traditionalization and mediatization. Doing so suggests how folkloristics and media studies have moved in parallel ways in questioning com-monsense definitions of core disciplinary concepts and in examining how folkloric and mediatized subjects and objects are produced. Two examples scrutinize these processes from opposite directions: A reexamination of the Kinder-und Hausmärchen analyzes the Brothers Grimm's methods not in terms of their ability to mirror features of oral narratives but as creating authoritative practices for mediatizing tradition. The second examines how public health officials, medical researchers, epidemiologists, journalists, and laypersons collaborated in producing the "swine flu pandemic" narrative in just twenty-four hours in 2009. While the Grimms made traditionalization and mediatization seem to go together hand-in-glove, the H1N1 virus was mediatized as new, even as the narrative was traditionalized. The conclusion points to the productivity of rejecting reified notions of folklore and "the media" in favor of examining particular ways that traditionalization and mediatization intersect, both as analytic tools and as real-world processes.
摘要:本文试图从根本上重新定位对“民俗学与媒体”的研究。在回顾了许多处理这一主题的方法后,本文通过传统化和中介化的概念重新定义了民俗学和媒体之间的关系。这样做表明,民俗学和媒体研究在质疑核心学科概念的荒谬定义以及研究民俗和中介化的主体和对象是如何产生的方面,是如何并行发展的。有两个例子从相反的方向审视了这些过程:重新审视Kinder und Hausmärchen,分析格林兄弟的方法,不是因为他们能够反映口头叙事的特征,而是因为他们创造了调解传统的权威实践。第二部分考察了公共卫生官员、医学研究人员、流行病学家、记者和非专业人士是如何在2009年短短24小时内合作制作“猪流感大流行”叙事的。虽然格林夫妇使传统化和媒介化似乎是齐头并进的,但H1N1病毒被媒介化为新的,即使叙事是传统化的。结论指出,拒绝民间传说和“媒体”的具体概念,而倾向于研究传统化和中介化交叉的特定方式,无论是作为分析工具还是作为现实世界的过程,这是一种生产力。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Folklore Research has provided an international forum for current theory and research among scholars of traditional culture since 1964. Each issue includes topical, incisive articles of current theoretical interest to folklore and ethnomusicology as international disciplines, as well as essays that address the fieldwork experience and the intellectual history of folklore and ethnomusicology studies. Contributors include scholars and professionals in additional fields, including anthropology, area studies, communication, cultural studies, history, linguistics, literature, performance studies, religion, and semiotics.