Including the Past: Performance Modeling Using a Preload Concept by Means of the Fitness-Fatigue Model

Q2 Computer Science
M. Ludwig, A. Asteroth, C. Rasche, M. Pfeiffer
{"title":"Including the Past: Performance Modeling Using a Preload Concept by Means of the Fitness-Fatigue Model","authors":"M. Ludwig, A. Asteroth, C. Rasche, M. Pfeiffer","doi":"10.2478/ijcss-2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In mathematical modeling by means of performance models, the Fitness-Fatigue Model (FF-Model) is a common approach in sport and exercise science to study the training performance relationship. The FF-Model uses an initial basic level of performance and two antagonistic terms (for fitness and fatigue). By model calibration, parameters are adapted to the subject’s individual physical response to training load. Although the simulation of the recorded training data in most cases shows useful results when the model is calibrated and all parameters are adjusted, this method has two major difficulties. First, a fitted value as basic performance will usually be too high. Second, without modification, the model cannot be simply used for prediction. By rewriting the FF-Model such that effects of former training history can be analyzed separately – we call those terms preload – it is possible to close the gap between a more realistic initial performance level and an athlete's actual performance level without distorting other model parameters and increase model accuracy substantially. Fitting error of the preload-extended FF-Model is less than 32% compared to the error of the FF-Model without preloads. Prediction error of the preload-extended FF-Model is around 54% of the error of the FF-Model without preloads.","PeriodicalId":38466,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Science in Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Science in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract In mathematical modeling by means of performance models, the Fitness-Fatigue Model (FF-Model) is a common approach in sport and exercise science to study the training performance relationship. The FF-Model uses an initial basic level of performance and two antagonistic terms (for fitness and fatigue). By model calibration, parameters are adapted to the subject’s individual physical response to training load. Although the simulation of the recorded training data in most cases shows useful results when the model is calibrated and all parameters are adjusted, this method has two major difficulties. First, a fitted value as basic performance will usually be too high. Second, without modification, the model cannot be simply used for prediction. By rewriting the FF-Model such that effects of former training history can be analyzed separately – we call those terms preload – it is possible to close the gap between a more realistic initial performance level and an athlete's actual performance level without distorting other model parameters and increase model accuracy substantially. Fitting error of the preload-extended FF-Model is less than 32% compared to the error of the FF-Model without preloads. Prediction error of the preload-extended FF-Model is around 54% of the error of the FF-Model without preloads.
包括过去:基于适应度-疲劳模型的预负荷概念的性能建模
摘要在性能模型的数学建模中,健身-疲劳模型(FF-Model)是体育运动科学研究训练性能关系的常用方法。ff模型使用一个初始的基本水平的表现和两个对立的术语(健身和疲劳)。通过模型校准,参数适应受试者对训练负荷的个体身体反应。虽然在大多数情况下,对记录的训练数据的模拟在校正模型和调整所有参数时显示有用的结果,但该方法有两个主要困难。首先,作为基本性能的拟合值通常过高。其次,如果不进行修正,模型不能简单地用于预测。通过重写FF-Model,使以前的训练历史的影响可以单独分析——我们称之为预负荷——有可能缩小更现实的初始表现水平和运动员实际表现水平之间的差距,而不会扭曲其他模型参数,并大大提高模型的准确性。与不加预紧力的预紧力模型相比,预紧力扩展后的预紧力模型拟合误差小于32%。预加载扩展后的FF-Model预测误差约为无预加载时的54%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Science in Sport
International Journal of Computer Science in Sport Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信