ANALISIS KRITIS PROBLEMATIKA HAK BERAGAMA DAN BERKEYAKINAN DALAM KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA DI INDONESIA

Achmad Nurholis Majid
{"title":"ANALISIS KRITIS PROBLEMATIKA HAK BERAGAMA DAN BERKEYAKINAN DALAM KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA DI INDONESIA","authors":"Achmad Nurholis Majid","doi":"10.28944/REFLEKTIKA.V15I1.397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Religiosity is an essential entity of Indonesian society. Only 0.04% of Indonesians do not choose official religion. This religious fact gives the government confidence that religion is determinant in the lives of Indonesian people. Then, the government poured that belief in the Law on the National Education System (No. 20/2003) Article 12 Section 1a. But then it ran into a problematic crucial. Incorporating religion in education can provide hope for social cohesion and become a cornerstone of morality. Still, on the other hand, it can be a laboratory for the transmission of extremism.  Therefore, the state policy in SISDIKNAS Article 12 Section 1a needs to be evaluated critically to understand and describe the substance of the policy, implementation, and impact, both planned and unplanned. For this purpose, this article tries to browse the literature to obtain the required data. This research provides some images. First, the Law generally has a positive substance but is very prone to causing social and legal problems caused by disproportionate and dilemmas derivatives of regulation. Second, the policy of religious rights and belief in the scope of education has not entirely led to the inclusive meaning of religion, resulting in several violations of human rights to the practice of exclusivism. Third, the orientation of religious significance can be the spirit of Indonesian national education.","PeriodicalId":55780,"journal":{"name":"Reflektika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflektika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28944/REFLEKTIKA.V15I1.397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Religiosity is an essential entity of Indonesian society. Only 0.04% of Indonesians do not choose official religion. This religious fact gives the government confidence that religion is determinant in the lives of Indonesian people. Then, the government poured that belief in the Law on the National Education System (No. 20/2003) Article 12 Section 1a. But then it ran into a problematic crucial. Incorporating religion in education can provide hope for social cohesion and become a cornerstone of morality. Still, on the other hand, it can be a laboratory for the transmission of extremism.  Therefore, the state policy in SISDIKNAS Article 12 Section 1a needs to be evaluated critically to understand and describe the substance of the policy, implementation, and impact, both planned and unplanned. For this purpose, this article tries to browse the literature to obtain the required data. This research provides some images. First, the Law generally has a positive substance but is very prone to causing social and legal problems caused by disproportionate and dilemmas derivatives of regulation. Second, the policy of religious rights and belief in the scope of education has not entirely led to the inclusive meaning of religion, resulting in several violations of human rights to the practice of exclusivism. Third, the orientation of religious significance can be the spirit of Indonesian national education.
对印尼宗教教育政策问题和信仰问题的批判性分析
宗教信仰是印尼社会的一个重要组成部分。只有0.04%的印尼人不选择官方宗教。这一宗教事实使政府相信,宗教是印尼人民生活的决定因素。然后,政府将这种信念倾注在《国家教育体系法》(第20/2003号)第12条第1a款中。但后来它遇到了一个有问题的关键。将宗教纳入教育可以为社会凝聚力带来希望,并成为道德的基石。然而,另一方面,它也可以成为极端主义传播的实验室。因此,SISDIKNAS第12条第1a节中的国家政策需要进行批判性评估,以理解和描述政策的实质、实施和影响,包括计划和计划外的。为此,本文试图浏览文献以获得所需的数据。这项研究提供了一些图像。首先,该法通常具有积极的实质内容,但很容易引发由监管衍生产品造成的不相称和困境所引起的社会和法律问题。第二,教育范围内的宗教权利和信仰政策并没有完全导致宗教的包容性,导致了几次侵犯人权的排外主义实践。第三,宗教意义的取向可以成为印尼国民教育的精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信