Social sustainability for whom? Developing an analytical approach through a tripartite collaboration

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fredrik Sunnemark, Emil Gahnström, Hedvig Rudström, E. Karlsson, Per Assmo
{"title":"Social sustainability for whom? Developing an analytical approach through a tripartite collaboration","authors":"Fredrik Sunnemark, Emil Gahnström, Hedvig Rudström, E. Karlsson, Per Assmo","doi":"10.1108/jwl-01-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSocial sustainability is a concept frequently referred to in public debates concerning how to construct the governance of future societies. The interpretations of its meaning, however, are ambiguous, and practices often dubious. Confronting top-down technocratic governance structures, this paper aims to argue for for tripartite collaborations between residents, higher education institutions (HEIs) and local government, as an approach toward social sustainability that involves residents’ interests in local governance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study argues that a specific time-spatial method of analysis can benefit the co-creation of knowledge as it passes through the spectrum of resident–HEI–local government. It provides a way for resident perceptions to become structured knowledge that originates from the residents, effectively engendering a bottom-up governance structure.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study shows how to include residents in policymaking and implementation processes as co-creators of knowledge, and thereby displays the possibility of examining knowledge and competence within municipal projects for social sustainability.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe model developed in this study can be used as a methodological instrument to analyze and expand resident participation in local social sustainability work. It thereby provides a toolbox for inclusive policymaking and strategies.\n","PeriodicalId":47077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-01-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Social sustainability is a concept frequently referred to in public debates concerning how to construct the governance of future societies. The interpretations of its meaning, however, are ambiguous, and practices often dubious. Confronting top-down technocratic governance structures, this paper aims to argue for for tripartite collaborations between residents, higher education institutions (HEIs) and local government, as an approach toward social sustainability that involves residents’ interests in local governance. Design/methodology/approach This study argues that a specific time-spatial method of analysis can benefit the co-creation of knowledge as it passes through the spectrum of resident–HEI–local government. It provides a way for resident perceptions to become structured knowledge that originates from the residents, effectively engendering a bottom-up governance structure. Findings This study shows how to include residents in policymaking and implementation processes as co-creators of knowledge, and thereby displays the possibility of examining knowledge and competence within municipal projects for social sustainability. Originality/value The model developed in this study can be used as a methodological instrument to analyze and expand resident participation in local social sustainability work. It thereby provides a toolbox for inclusive policymaking and strategies.
社会可持续性对谁有利?通过三方合作发展分析方法
目的社会可持续性是关于如何构建未来社会治理的公开辩论中经常提到的一个概念。然而,对其含义的解释是模棱两可的,而且实践往往令人怀疑。面对自上而下的技术官僚治理结构,本文旨在主张居民、高等教育机构和地方政府之间的三方合作,作为一种涉及居民在地方治理中利益的社会可持续性方法。设计/方法论/方法本研究认为,一种特定的时空分析方法可以有利于知识的共同创造,因为它可以通过居民——高等教育机构——地方政府的范围。它为居民的感知提供了一种方式,使其成为源自居民的结构化知识,有效地产生了自下而上的治理结构。研究结果这项研究展示了如何将居民作为知识的共同创造者纳入决策和实施过程,从而展示了在市政项目中审查知识和能力以实现社会可持续性的可能性。独创性/价值本研究开发的模型可作为分析和扩大居民参与当地社会可持续性工作的方法工具。从而为包容性政策制定和战略提供了一个工具箱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal of Workplace Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Learning aims to provide an avenue for the presentation and discussion of research related to the workplace as a site for learning. Its scope encompasses formal, informal and incidental learning in the workplace for individuals, groups and teams, as well as work-based learning, and off-the-job learning for the workplace. This focus on learning in, from and for the workplace also brings with it questions about the nature of interventions that might assist the learning process and of the roles of those responsible directly or indirectly for such interventions. Since workplace learning cannot be considered without reference to its context, another aim of the journal is to explore the organisational, policy, political, resource issues and other factors which influence how, when and why that learning takes place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信