ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems.

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Bala Muralikrishnan, Meghan Shilling, Vincent Lee
{"title":"ASME B89.4.23 Performance Evaluation Tests and Geometry Errors in X-Ray Computed Tomography Systems.","authors":"Bala Muralikrishnan, Meghan Shilling, Vincent Lee","doi":"10.6028/jres.126.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A documentary standard produced by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for performance evaluation of industrial X-ray computed tomography (XCT) systems for dimensional measurements was released in early 2021. This standard, ASME B89.4.23-2020, specifies test procedures that may be performed to determine whether a system meets the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for acceptance before or after purchase, or for periodic reverification. While there are some core testing requirements in the standard, there is also some flexibility, allowing for a variety of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the standard. It is important that the chosen testing configuration be sensitive to the different systematic sources of error in XCT systems to provide confidence that the system will meet the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for measurements performed by the user subsequent to testing. In this paper, we provide guidance on how to optimally apply the ASME 89.4.23 standard in industry to achieve high sensitivity to geometry errors in cone-beam XCT systems. Through simulation studies, we present some examples of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the ASME B89.4.23 standard and discuss their sensitivity to geometry errors of the detector and the rotation stage. We show that there are some testing configurations that achieve maximal sensitivity to these errors, while other configurations do not capture these error sources with adequate sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A documentary standard produced by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) for performance evaluation of industrial X-ray computed tomography (XCT) systems for dimensional measurements was released in early 2021. This standard, ASME B89.4.23-2020, specifies test procedures that may be performed to determine whether a system meets the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for acceptance before or after purchase, or for periodic reverification. While there are some core testing requirements in the standard, there is also some flexibility, allowing for a variety of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the standard. It is important that the chosen testing configuration be sensitive to the different systematic sources of error in XCT systems to provide confidence that the system will meet the manufacturer's accuracy specifications for measurements performed by the user subsequent to testing. In this paper, we provide guidance on how to optimally apply the ASME 89.4.23 standard in industry to achieve high sensitivity to geometry errors in cone-beam XCT systems. Through simulation studies, we present some examples of testing configurations that meet the requirements of the ASME B89.4.23 standard and discuss their sensitivity to geometry errors of the detector and the rotation stage. We show that there are some testing configurations that achieve maximal sensitivity to these errors, while other configurations do not capture these error sources with adequate sensitivity.

ASME B89.4.23 x射线计算机断层扫描系统的性能评估测试和几何误差
2021年初,美国机械工程师学会(ASME)发布了一份用于尺寸测量的工业X射线计算机断层扫描(XCT)系统性能评估的文件标准。本标准ASME B89.4.23-2020规定了可执行的测试程序,以确定系统是否符合制造商的精度规范,以便在购买前或购买后进行验收,或进行定期重新验证。虽然标准中有一些核心测试要求,但也有一些灵活性,允许满足标准要求的各种测试配置。重要的是,所选择的测试配置对XCT系统中不同的系统误差源敏感,以提供系统将满足制造商对用户在测试后进行的测量的精度规范的信心。在本文中,我们提供了如何在工业中最佳应用ASME 89.4.23标准的指导,以实现对锥形梁XCT系统几何误差的高灵敏度。通过仿真研究,我们给出了一些符合ASME B89.4.23标准要求的测试配置示例,并讨论了它们对探测器和旋转台几何误差的敏感性。我们表明,有些测试配置可以实现对这些误差的最大灵敏度,而其他配置则不能以足够的灵敏度捕获这些误差源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is the flagship publication of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. It has been published under various titles and forms since 1904, with its roots as Scientific Papers issued as the Bulletin of the Bureau of Standards. In 1928, the Scientific Papers were combined with Technologic Papers, which reported results of investigations of material and methods of testing. This new publication was titled the Bureau of Standards Journal of Research. The Journal of Research of NIST reports NIST research and development in metrology and related fields of physical science, engineering, applied mathematics, statistics, biotechnology, information technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信