Identifying struggling teams in online challenge-based learning

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
H. Nguyen, H. Gijlers, G. Pisoni
{"title":"Identifying struggling teams in online challenge-based learning","authors":"H. Nguyen, H. Gijlers, G. Pisoni","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-06-2022-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the study is to determine how to determine how students perceive groupwork and identify patterns of less successful groups in online challenge-based learning.Design/methodology/approachThis study involved 29 university students working in nine teams in an online challenge-based course. The authors applied Volet's (2001) Student Appraisal of Group Assignments (SAGA) instrument to measure students' perceptions on six constructs: Cognitive Benefits, Motivation Influence, Affect, Interpersonal, Management, and Group Assessment. Questionnaires were administered at different time points (before, during, and after the project). Focus groups were conducted to gain insights into students' experiences.FindingsFindings suggest that students reporting decreasing or stalling perception scores on the Motivation Influence, Interpersonal constructs would likely not be in high-performing groups. Additionally, challenge-based learning is less suitable for time-compressed courses.Originality/valueThe study expands the understanding of students' perceptions of online challenge-based learning, at different performance levels, and difficulties in these projects. Practical implications of this study are support for teachers in identifying struggling teams, and designing and facilitating challenge-based courses.","PeriodicalId":45549,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-06-2022-0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the study is to determine how to determine how students perceive groupwork and identify patterns of less successful groups in online challenge-based learning.Design/methodology/approachThis study involved 29 university students working in nine teams in an online challenge-based course. The authors applied Volet's (2001) Student Appraisal of Group Assignments (SAGA) instrument to measure students' perceptions on six constructs: Cognitive Benefits, Motivation Influence, Affect, Interpersonal, Management, and Group Assessment. Questionnaires were administered at different time points (before, during, and after the project). Focus groups were conducted to gain insights into students' experiences.FindingsFindings suggest that students reporting decreasing or stalling perception scores on the Motivation Influence, Interpersonal constructs would likely not be in high-performing groups. Additionally, challenge-based learning is less suitable for time-compressed courses.Originality/valueThe study expands the understanding of students' perceptions of online challenge-based learning, at different performance levels, and difficulties in these projects. Practical implications of this study are support for teachers in identifying struggling teams, and designing and facilitating challenge-based courses.
识别在线挑战学习中挣扎的团队
本研究的目的是确定如何确定学生如何看待小组合作,并确定在线挑战学习中不太成功的小组模式。设计/方法/方法这项研究涉及29名大学生,他们分为9个小组,参加一门基于在线挑战的课程。作者采用Volet(2001)的学生小组作业评估(SAGA)工具来测量学生对六个构念的看法:认知利益、动机影响、情感、人际关系、管理和小组评估。问卷调查是在不同的时间点(项目之前、期间和之后)进行的。小组讨论是为了深入了解学生的经历。研究结果表明,在动机影响、人际关系构建方面,报告感知得分下降或停滞的学生很可能不在高绩效群体中。此外,基于挑战的学习不太适合时间紧迫的课程。独创性/价值本研究扩展了学生对不同表现水平的在线挑战式学习的看法,以及这些项目中的困难。本研究的实际意义是支持教师识别困难的团队,设计和促进基于挑战的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning
Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信