Queer Experiences Within the Bounds of International Relations

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Alternatives Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1177/03043754231183560

Jamie J. Hagen, Alex Edney-Browne

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this commentary, from our positionality as members of the LGBTQA Caucus executive committee, we consider the academic and embodied barriers that stand in the way of a more inclusive IR from the perspective of queer and trans scholars in the discipline. We offer our reflections from our positionalities as queer scholars applying queer theory in IR, including our work in the Caucus to support LGBTQ + scholars in the discipline as a means of confronting what continues to be a very narrowly accessible space – geographically, financially, socially and linguistically. Relatedly, we consider the embodied experience of not belonging to the discipline of IR; an experience that many LGBTQ + scholars will recognise.

查看原文本刊更多论文

国际关系中的奇妙体验

在这篇评论中，从我们作为LGBTQA核心小组执行委员会成员的立场来看，我们从学科中的酷儿和跨性别学者的角度考虑了阻碍更具包容性的IR的学术和具体障碍。我们提供了我们作为酷儿学者在IR中应用酷儿理论的立场的反思，包括我们在核心小组中的工作，以支持该学科中的LGBTQ+学者，以此来面对地理、经济、社会和语言上仍然非常狭窄的空间。与此相关的是，我们认为不属于IR学科的具体经验；许多LGBTQ+学者都会认识到这一经历。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Alternatives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： A peer-reviewed journal, Alternatives explores the possibilities of new forms of political practice and identity under increasingly global conditions. Specifically, the editors focus on the changing relationships between local political practices and identities and emerging forms of global economy, culture, and polity. Published in association with the Center for the Study of Developing Societies (India).