Are Listening and Interpersonal Communication Skills Predictive of Professionalism in Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students?

Q1 Nursing
Ted Brown, Mong-lin Yu, Jamie Etherington
{"title":"Are Listening and Interpersonal Communication Skills Predictive of Professionalism in Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students?","authors":"Ted Brown,&nbsp;Mong-lin Yu,&nbsp;Jamie Etherington","doi":"10.1016/j.hpe.2020.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate if self-report measures of listening and interpersonal communication skills in undergraduate occupational therapy students predict aspects of professionalism.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study of 135 third- and fourth-year students enrolled in the four-year Bachelor of Occupational Therapy (Honours) course at Monash University in Australia. Students completed the <em>Active-Empathetic Listening Scale</em> (AELS), the <em>Listening Styles Profile-Revised</em> (LSP-R) and the <em>Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale</em> (ICCS). The <em>Penn State College of Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire</em> (PSCOPQ) measured aspects of students' professionalism. The AELS, LSP-R, ICCS and PSCOPQ instruments have established validity and reported reliability. Regression analysis with bootstrapping examined the relationships between students' listening and interpersonal skills and professional attributes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant associations were observed across several PSCOPQ professionalism domains: Sensing (AELS) (<em>p</em> = .029) and Self-Disclosure (ICCS) (<em>p</em> = .026) predicted Accountability (PSCOPQ); Task-Oriented (LSP) (<em>p</em> = .019) predicted Equity (PSCOPQ); and Expressiveness (ICCS) (<em>p</em> = .023) predicted Duty (PSCOPQ). Assertiveness (ICCS) (<em>p</em> = .048) and Self-Disclosure (ICCS) (<em>p</em> = .049) were weak predictors of Duty and Altruism (PSCOPQ), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings demonstrate the significance of listening and interpersonal communication in developing aspects of professionalism in students and emphasise the important of providing opportunities within occupational therapy education curricula that facilitate and enhance students' learning and application of active listening and communication skills. This will better prepare students to successfully complete course programs, assist in the development of their professional self-identity and equip them with the necessary professional attributes as they transition into the workforce.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93562,"journal":{"name":"Health professions education","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 187-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.01.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health professions education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452301120300158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate if self-report measures of listening and interpersonal communication skills in undergraduate occupational therapy students predict aspects of professionalism.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of 135 third- and fourth-year students enrolled in the four-year Bachelor of Occupational Therapy (Honours) course at Monash University in Australia. Students completed the Active-Empathetic Listening Scale (AELS), the Listening Styles Profile-Revised (LSP-R) and the Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale (ICCS). The Penn State College of Medicine Professionalism Questionnaire (PSCOPQ) measured aspects of students' professionalism. The AELS, LSP-R, ICCS and PSCOPQ instruments have established validity and reported reliability. Regression analysis with bootstrapping examined the relationships between students' listening and interpersonal skills and professional attributes.

Results

Significant associations were observed across several PSCOPQ professionalism domains: Sensing (AELS) (p = .029) and Self-Disclosure (ICCS) (p = .026) predicted Accountability (PSCOPQ); Task-Oriented (LSP) (p = .019) predicted Equity (PSCOPQ); and Expressiveness (ICCS) (p = .023) predicted Duty (PSCOPQ). Assertiveness (ICCS) (p = .048) and Self-Disclosure (ICCS) (p = .049) were weak predictors of Duty and Altruism (PSCOPQ), respectively.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate the significance of listening and interpersonal communication in developing aspects of professionalism in students and emphasise the important of providing opportunities within occupational therapy education curricula that facilitate and enhance students' learning and application of active listening and communication skills. This will better prepare students to successfully complete course programs, assist in the development of their professional self-identity and equip them with the necessary professional attributes as they transition into the workforce.

职业治疗本科学生的倾听和人际沟通能力是否预示专业精神?
目的探讨职业治疗本科学生的听力和人际沟通能力自述量表是否能预测专业精神的各个方面。方法对澳大利亚莫纳什大学四年制职业治疗(荣誉)学士课程的135名三年级和四年级学生进行横断面研究。学生完成了主动共情倾听量表(AELS)、倾听风格修正量表(LSP-R)和人际沟通能力量表(ICCS)。宾夕法尼亚州立医学院专业精神问卷(PSCOPQ)测量学生专业精神的各个方面。AELS, LSP-R, ICCS和PSCOPQ仪器已建立效度和报告信度。回归分析采用自举法检验学生听力与人际交往能力和专业属性之间的关系。结果在多个PSCOPQ专业领域中观察到显著关联:感知(AELS) (p = 0.029)和自我披露(ICCS) (p = 0.026)预测问责(PSCOPQ);任务导向(LSP) (p = 0.019)预测公平(PSCOPQ);表达性(ICCS) (p = 0.023)预测责任(PSCOPQ)。自信(ICCS) (p = 0.048)和自我表露(ICCS) (p = 0.049)分别是责任和利他主义(PSCOPQ)的弱预测因子。结论研究结果表明,听力和人际沟通在培养学生专业精神方面的重要性,并强调在职业治疗教育课程中提供机会,促进和提高学生积极倾听和沟通技能的学习和应用的重要性。这将更好地为学生顺利完成课程项目做好准备,帮助他们发展职业自我认同,并在他们过渡到劳动力市场时为他们提供必要的职业属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信