Introduction: The Crowd in the History of Political Thought—A Conversation in a Socratic Spirit

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Jaffe, Guillermo Graíño Ferrer
{"title":"Introduction: The Crowd in the History of Political Thought—A Conversation in a Socratic Spirit","authors":"S. Jaffe, Guillermo Graíño Ferrer","doi":"10.1017/s003467052200122x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article introduces a symposium, “The Crowd in the History of Political Thought,” which is being published as a two-part special issue. The articles are by American and European scholars with disparate interests and approaches to the history of political thought. Some engage contemporary questions, while others offer interpretive analyses. Today, commentators, scholars, and pundits alike ignore the history of political thought to the detriment of their understanding of populism. Many thinkers have reflected on democratic health and sickness. The articles here furnish a partial catalog of the quarrels associated with this inherited vocabulary. The tradition itself is best conceived of as an unfinished Socratic conversation. In this issue, articles on Thucydides, Aristophanes, Plato, and Aristotle orbit the original democracy at Athens, the backdrop for reflections on popular rule of so many thinkers. The final article on Josephus moves away from the experience of the Greek polis toward the more contemporary preoccupations of the second issue.","PeriodicalId":52549,"journal":{"name":"Review of Politics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s003467052200122x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article introduces a symposium, “The Crowd in the History of Political Thought,” which is being published as a two-part special issue. The articles are by American and European scholars with disparate interests and approaches to the history of political thought. Some engage contemporary questions, while others offer interpretive analyses. Today, commentators, scholars, and pundits alike ignore the history of political thought to the detriment of their understanding of populism. Many thinkers have reflected on democratic health and sickness. The articles here furnish a partial catalog of the quarrels associated with this inherited vocabulary. The tradition itself is best conceived of as an unfinished Socratic conversation. In this issue, articles on Thucydides, Aristophanes, Plato, and Aristotle orbit the original democracy at Athens, the backdrop for reflections on popular rule of so many thinkers. The final article on Josephus moves away from the experience of the Greek polis toward the more contemporary preoccupations of the second issue.
引言:政治思想史上的人群——一场苏格拉底精神的对话
这篇文章介绍了一篇名为“政治思想史中的人群”的专题讨论会,该专题讨论会将以两部分的特刊形式出版。这些文章是由美国和欧洲的学者撰写的,他们对政治思想史有着不同的兴趣和研究方法。一些涉及当代问题,而另一些则提供解释性分析。今天,评论员、学者和权威人士都忽视了政治思想史,从而损害了他们对民粹主义的理解。许多思想家对民主的健康和疾病进行了反思。这里的文章提供了与这个遗传词汇有关的争吵的部分目录。这个传统本身最好被理解为一个未完成的苏格拉底式对话。本期,关于修昔底德、阿里斯托芬、柏拉图和亚里士多德的文章围绕着雅典最初的民主展开,这也是许多思想家反思民众统治的背景。关于约瑟夫斯的最后一篇文章,从希腊城邦的经历,转向更现代的关注,第二个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Politics
Review of Politics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信