Everyday Police Work Abroad: A Story of Experience, Continuity and Change in Multilateral Missions

IF 1.5 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
P. Neubauer, Cornelius Friesendorf, Ursula C. Schroeder
{"title":"Everyday Police Work Abroad: A Story of Experience, Continuity and Change in Multilateral Missions","authors":"P. Neubauer, Cornelius Friesendorf, Ursula C. Schroeder","doi":"10.1080/13533312.2022.2047026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Nowadays, police officers are regularly deployed as members of multilateral peace operations. This article examines how these experts implement their mandates and how we can understand their activities. For this, we draw on a set of 90 semi-structured interviews with European police experts who have experience in multilateral policing. We find that, to navigate their work abroad, European police officers primarily rely on their own domestic policing experience, their experience from previous deployments and the experience of colleagues they meet in the mission. The extent to which they can rely on their own experience is shaped by how much discretion they find at their disposal. We identify two conditions limiting their discretion: the preferences, policies and histories of host states, and institutional lock-in effects within missions that reduce officers’ room to manoeuvre over time. While we also find that officers do not normally draw on international guidance documents in their everyday work, missions can nevertheless be regarded as sites where more localized transnational policing practices emerge. These mission-specific transnational practices are formed, over time, by successive cohorts of police officers from different countries.","PeriodicalId":47231,"journal":{"name":"International Peacekeeping","volume":"29 1","pages":"308 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2022.2047026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nowadays, police officers are regularly deployed as members of multilateral peace operations. This article examines how these experts implement their mandates and how we can understand their activities. For this, we draw on a set of 90 semi-structured interviews with European police experts who have experience in multilateral policing. We find that, to navigate their work abroad, European police officers primarily rely on their own domestic policing experience, their experience from previous deployments and the experience of colleagues they meet in the mission. The extent to which they can rely on their own experience is shaped by how much discretion they find at their disposal. We identify two conditions limiting their discretion: the preferences, policies and histories of host states, and institutional lock-in effects within missions that reduce officers’ room to manoeuvre over time. While we also find that officers do not normally draw on international guidance documents in their everyday work, missions can nevertheless be regarded as sites where more localized transnational policing practices emerge. These mission-specific transnational practices are formed, over time, by successive cohorts of police officers from different countries.
海外警察日常工作:多边任务的经验、连续性和变化
摘要如今,警察作为多边和平行动的成员定期部署。本文探讨了这些专家如何执行他们的任务,以及我们如何理解他们的活动。为此,我们对在多边警务方面有经验的欧洲警察专家进行了90次半结构化采访。我们发现,为了在国外开展工作,欧洲警察主要依靠自己的国内警务经验、以前部署的经验以及在任务中遇到的同事的经验。他们可以在多大程度上依赖自己的经验,取决于他们有多大的自由裁量权。我们确定了两个限制他们自由裁量权的条件:东道国的偏好、政策和历史,以及特派团内部的制度锁定效应,这些效应会随着时间的推移减少军官的机动空间。虽然我们还发现,警察在日常工作中通常不会借鉴国际指导文件,但特派团仍然可以被视为出现更多本地化跨国警务做法的地方。随着时间的推移,这些针对特定任务的跨国做法是由来自不同国家的一批又一批警察形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Peacekeeping
International Peacekeeping INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.40%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信