Bioethical Principles in Home-Based Virtual Care

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
N. Bendahan, Sophy Chan, R. Appireddy
{"title":"Bioethical Principles in Home-Based Virtual Care","authors":"N. Bendahan, Sophy Chan, R. Appireddy","doi":"10.7202/1073788ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual care (VC), a novel method of healthcare delivery, allows patients to stay home or at their preferred location and use personal internet-enabled devices to video-conference with their healthcare provider. VC is becoming ubiquitous across the US and Canada, particularly in response to COVID-19. In this paper, we discuss the benefits and limitations of VC and explore how it may align with or detract from the four principles of bioethics through case studies. Overall, we argue that it allows for greater accessibility, availability, and affordability of healthcare. However, certain clinical scenarios may not be suitable for VC, particularly when a thorough physical examination is required. While it may not always be clear when to use digital health technologies, it is prudent to have an honest and open conversation with the patient when offering this option.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1073788ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Virtual care (VC), a novel method of healthcare delivery, allows patients to stay home or at their preferred location and use personal internet-enabled devices to video-conference with their healthcare provider. VC is becoming ubiquitous across the US and Canada, particularly in response to COVID-19. In this paper, we discuss the benefits and limitations of VC and explore how it may align with or detract from the four principles of bioethics through case studies. Overall, we argue that it allows for greater accessibility, availability, and affordability of healthcare. However, certain clinical scenarios may not be suitable for VC, particularly when a thorough physical examination is required. While it may not always be clear when to use digital health technologies, it is prudent to have an honest and open conversation with the patient when offering this option.
基于家庭的虚拟护理中的生物伦理原则
虚拟医疗(VC)是一种新颖的医疗服务方式,它允许患者呆在家里或在他们喜欢的地点,使用支持互联网的个人设备与他们的医疗服务提供者进行视频会议。风险投资在美国和加拿大变得无处不在,尤其是在应对COVID-19的过程中。在本文中,我们讨论了风险投资的好处和局限性,并通过案例研究探讨了它如何与生物伦理学的四项原则保持一致或减损。总的来说,我们认为它允许更大的可及性、可用性和可负担性的医疗保健。然而,某些临床情况可能不适合VC,特别是当需要进行彻底的身体检查时。虽然何时使用数字医疗技术可能并不总是很清楚,但在提供这种选择时,与患者进行诚实和开放的对话是明智的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Canadian Journal of Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信