{"title":"How Outsiders Within Are Made: Structural Inequalities and the Making of Academic Outsiders","authors":"A. Meghji","doi":"10.1177/00943061231191420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic Outsider: Stories of Exclusion and Hope, Victoria Reyes claims, ‘‘has been fueled by anger—the fury—that grows from the entrenched racism and sexism I encounter every day in the academy’’ (pp. 101–102). Reyes’s approach to analyzing this entrenched racism and sexism is inspired by Du Boisian and Black feminist epistemologies, based on using ‘‘the personal . . . to critique structures of power’’ (p. xiii). In this regard, Reyes’s Academic Outsider reminds me a lot of Du Bois’s Dusk of Dawn, or Patricia Hill Collins’s Fighting Words in the way she cogently weaves between personal narratives, extant sociological theory, and the structural workings of academia and the world in which academia is situated. At a time when there is a plethora of books intended to guide graduate students and faculty through the academic world— what Reyes refers to in her book as sorts of navigational capital and unspoken rules of academic citizenship—Academic Outsider remains unique in the way that it is less a ‘‘how-to’’ guide and more of a ‘‘how does’’ guide. By this, I mean that Reyes’s book draws on her experiences to explain to us how the academy keeps working as it does despite growing recognitions that the academic world is shaped by fundamental inequalities of racism, sexism, classism, and ableism. Reyes’s book thus encompasses a range of discussions—from the politics of citation through to ‘‘overlapping shifts’’ as a mother during the pandemic, academia’s ‘‘motherhood penalty,’’ and reimbursement culture—to show us precisely how, in personal detail, the academy remains a space of deep inequality. A central theme running through Academic Outsider is that there are insiders and outsiders in the U.S. academy and that the academy is designed for the former. From the very language of insiders and outsiders, Reyes deliberately engages with Patricia Hill Collins’s concept of ‘‘the outsider within’’ and a wide range of Black feminist scholarship generated by, to name a few cited figures, Anna Julia Cooper, bell hooks, and Audre Lorde. Reyes connects with this stream of Black feminist scholarship in the way that it highlights ‘‘an invisible barrier separating ‘us’ from ‘them,’ being always on the outside, forever seeing but not fully being a part of that other side’’ (p. 9). Reyes’s book then takes us on a tour of how the insider/outsider boundaries of academia work. As Reyes excavates how insiders and outsiders are made and reproduced in the U.S. academy, we get an array of useful concepts that help name the processes going on. One such concept is academic citizenship, which ‘‘concerns not only the rights and responsibilities of those in the academy, which are differentiated and tied to rank . . . it also encompasses the sense of belonging, access to political participation, and sets of practices and claims-making related to academic life, all of which are racialized, gendered, and classed’’ (p. 43). The rights of academic citizenship, Reyes argues, are Academic Outsider: Stories of Exclusion and Hope, by Victoria Reyes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. 184 pp. $14.00 paper. ISBN: 9781503632998.","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"395 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Academic Outsider: Stories of Exclusion and Hope, Victoria Reyes claims, ‘‘has been fueled by anger—the fury—that grows from the entrenched racism and sexism I encounter every day in the academy’’ (pp. 101–102). Reyes’s approach to analyzing this entrenched racism and sexism is inspired by Du Boisian and Black feminist epistemologies, based on using ‘‘the personal . . . to critique structures of power’’ (p. xiii). In this regard, Reyes’s Academic Outsider reminds me a lot of Du Bois’s Dusk of Dawn, or Patricia Hill Collins’s Fighting Words in the way she cogently weaves between personal narratives, extant sociological theory, and the structural workings of academia and the world in which academia is situated. At a time when there is a plethora of books intended to guide graduate students and faculty through the academic world— what Reyes refers to in her book as sorts of navigational capital and unspoken rules of academic citizenship—Academic Outsider remains unique in the way that it is less a ‘‘how-to’’ guide and more of a ‘‘how does’’ guide. By this, I mean that Reyes’s book draws on her experiences to explain to us how the academy keeps working as it does despite growing recognitions that the academic world is shaped by fundamental inequalities of racism, sexism, classism, and ableism. Reyes’s book thus encompasses a range of discussions—from the politics of citation through to ‘‘overlapping shifts’’ as a mother during the pandemic, academia’s ‘‘motherhood penalty,’’ and reimbursement culture—to show us precisely how, in personal detail, the academy remains a space of deep inequality. A central theme running through Academic Outsider is that there are insiders and outsiders in the U.S. academy and that the academy is designed for the former. From the very language of insiders and outsiders, Reyes deliberately engages with Patricia Hill Collins’s concept of ‘‘the outsider within’’ and a wide range of Black feminist scholarship generated by, to name a few cited figures, Anna Julia Cooper, bell hooks, and Audre Lorde. Reyes connects with this stream of Black feminist scholarship in the way that it highlights ‘‘an invisible barrier separating ‘us’ from ‘them,’ being always on the outside, forever seeing but not fully being a part of that other side’’ (p. 9). Reyes’s book then takes us on a tour of how the insider/outsider boundaries of academia work. As Reyes excavates how insiders and outsiders are made and reproduced in the U.S. academy, we get an array of useful concepts that help name the processes going on. One such concept is academic citizenship, which ‘‘concerns not only the rights and responsibilities of those in the academy, which are differentiated and tied to rank . . . it also encompasses the sense of belonging, access to political participation, and sets of practices and claims-making related to academic life, all of which are racialized, gendered, and classed’’ (p. 43). The rights of academic citizenship, Reyes argues, are Academic Outsider: Stories of Exclusion and Hope, by Victoria Reyes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. 184 pp. $14.00 paper. ISBN: 9781503632998.
《学术局外人:排斥与希望的故事》(Academic Outsider:Stories of Exclusion and Hope),维多利亚·雷耶斯(Victoria Reyes)声称,“我每天在学院里遇到的根深蒂固的种族主义和性别歧视引发了愤怒”(第101–102页)。雷耶斯分析这种根深蒂固的种族主义和性别歧视的方法受到了杜波依斯和黑人女权主义认识论的启发,基于“个人。批判权力结构”(第十三页)。在这方面,雷耶斯的《学术局外人》让我想起了杜波依斯的《黎明的黄昏》,或者帕特里夏·希尔·科林斯的《战斗的话语》,因为她在个人叙事、现存的社会学理论、学术界和学术界所处世界的结构运作之间令人信服地交织在一起。当有大量书籍旨在引导研究生和教职员工了解学术世界时——雷耶斯在书中称之为航海资本和学术公民的潜规则——《学术局外人》仍然是独一无二的,它不是一本“该怎么做”的指南,而是一本“怎么做”指南。我的意思是,雷耶斯的书借鉴了她的经历,向我们解释了尽管人们越来越认识到学术界是由种族主义、性别歧视、阶级主义和能力主义的根本不平等所塑造的,但学院是如何继续运作的。因此,雷耶斯的书涵盖了一系列讨论——从引用政治到疫情期间作为母亲的“重叠转变”、学术界的“母亲惩罚”和报销文化——以个人细节向我们展示了学院如何仍然是一个深度不平等的空间。贯穿《学术局外人》的一个中心主题是,美国学院有内部人也有外部人,学院是为前者设计的。从内部人和外部人的语言来看,雷耶斯有意采用帕特里夏·希尔·柯林斯的“内部外部人”概念,以及安娜·朱莉娅·库珀、贝尔·胡克和奥德尔·罗德等知名人士所产生的广泛的黑人女权主义学术。雷耶斯与这股黑人女权主义学术流的联系在于,它突出了“一道无形的屏障,将‘我们’与‘他们’分隔开来,‘永远在外面,永远看到但不完全成为另一面的一部分’”(第9页)。雷耶斯的书带我们参观了学术界内部/外部界限是如何运作的。当Reyes深入研究内部人和外部人是如何在美国学院中形成和复制的时,我们得到了一系列有用的概念,这些概念有助于命名正在进行的过程。其中一个概念是学术公民身份,它“不仅涉及学院中人员的权利和责任,而且与等级有区别和联系。”。它还包括归属感、获得政治参与的机会,以及与学术生活相关的一系列实践和主张,所有这些都是种族化、性别化和分类的(第43页)。雷耶斯认为,学术公民的权利是维多利亚·雷耶斯的《学术局外人:排斥与希望的故事》。加利福尼亚州斯坦福:斯坦福大学出版社,2022年。184页,论文14.00美元。ISBN:9781503632998。