“Parents just don’t understand” – generational perceptions of education and work

K. Cheong, Christopher Hill, Yin-Ching Leong, Chen Zhang, Zheng Zhang
{"title":"“Parents just don’t understand” – generational perceptions of education and work","authors":"K. Cheong, Christopher Hill, Yin-Ching Leong, Chen Zhang, Zheng Zhang","doi":"10.1108/HEED-06-2018-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nUsing a Southeast Asian context, this paper asks a question that has seldom been researched: Is there a divergence between parents’ and their college-going children’s perceptions of education and employability at a time of rapid economic change? If such a divergence exists, it would have hidden costs for the children. Parents’ choice of professions no longer in demand when their children reach working age can permanently damage the latter’s earning power. Also, parents’ choice of fields of study that their children are not proficient or interested in jeopardizes the latter’s chances of success in their studies. The paper aims to discuss these issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData were collected using mixed methods, a combination of structured online questionnaires from two local special-purpose sample surveys conducted by the authors, and follow-up interviews. Graduate Employment Survey 2 (GES2) was the second of a three-phase British Council-sponsored study, focusing on TNE, that used a structured online questionnaire for students of several tertiary education institutions, both in the public and private sectors, and for several group interviews of students in 2015. A structured questionnaire was also administered to a small number of parents.\n\n\nFindings\nIn terms of employment, the rankings of HEIs by parents and students were generally consistent. Study in foreign HEIs abroad has the highest likelihood of employment. Branch campuses were ranked next highest. Despite this, of interest is the difference in mean scores between first and second ranked HEIs. Whereas students rate branch campuses as not much inferior to foreign university campuses, parents see a major gulf between them – they rate foreign campuses more highly than branch campuses more poorly. This difference is likely caused by parents’ traditional preference for foreign study over local, coupled with a lack of TNE knowledge.\n\n\nSocial implications\nA fundamental issue of perception is how parents and students see the role of education. Is education a destination or is education a journey? This disconnect has consequences. Given the shifting nature of employment, the need for transferable skills and the fact that some of the jobs that the next generation will be doing are not even known today, parental advice based on what they know may not do justice to their children’s choice of career. Likewise, the approach of TNE to promote traditional degrees to job paths is also a conventional approach that has a limited shelf life.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe role of parents in education choice has received surprisingly scant academic attention. With technological change driving product and service innovation ever more rapidly, previously unknown types of work have emerged in a relatively short span of time. In this situation, the risk of mismatched perceptions between parents and their children, whose educational experience spans a generation, is becoming increasingly real. While most studies of a parental role have been undertaken for Western countries, there is much less research on East Asian parents’ role in their children’s education.\n","PeriodicalId":32842,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/HEED-06-2018-0016","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Evaluation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-06-2018-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Using a Southeast Asian context, this paper asks a question that has seldom been researched: Is there a divergence between parents’ and their college-going children’s perceptions of education and employability at a time of rapid economic change? If such a divergence exists, it would have hidden costs for the children. Parents’ choice of professions no longer in demand when their children reach working age can permanently damage the latter’s earning power. Also, parents’ choice of fields of study that their children are not proficient or interested in jeopardizes the latter’s chances of success in their studies. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected using mixed methods, a combination of structured online questionnaires from two local special-purpose sample surveys conducted by the authors, and follow-up interviews. Graduate Employment Survey 2 (GES2) was the second of a three-phase British Council-sponsored study, focusing on TNE, that used a structured online questionnaire for students of several tertiary education institutions, both in the public and private sectors, and for several group interviews of students in 2015. A structured questionnaire was also administered to a small number of parents. Findings In terms of employment, the rankings of HEIs by parents and students were generally consistent. Study in foreign HEIs abroad has the highest likelihood of employment. Branch campuses were ranked next highest. Despite this, of interest is the difference in mean scores between first and second ranked HEIs. Whereas students rate branch campuses as not much inferior to foreign university campuses, parents see a major gulf between them – they rate foreign campuses more highly than branch campuses more poorly. This difference is likely caused by parents’ traditional preference for foreign study over local, coupled with a lack of TNE knowledge. Social implications A fundamental issue of perception is how parents and students see the role of education. Is education a destination or is education a journey? This disconnect has consequences. Given the shifting nature of employment, the need for transferable skills and the fact that some of the jobs that the next generation will be doing are not even known today, parental advice based on what they know may not do justice to their children’s choice of career. Likewise, the approach of TNE to promote traditional degrees to job paths is also a conventional approach that has a limited shelf life. Originality/value The role of parents in education choice has received surprisingly scant academic attention. With technological change driving product and service innovation ever more rapidly, previously unknown types of work have emerged in a relatively short span of time. In this situation, the risk of mismatched perceptions between parents and their children, whose educational experience spans a generation, is becoming increasingly real. While most studies of a parental role have been undertaken for Western countries, there is much less research on East Asian parents’ role in their children’s education.
“父母就是不理解”——这一代人对教育和工作的看法
目的本文以东南亚为背景,提出了一个很少被研究的问题:在经济快速变化的时代,父母和即将上大学的孩子对教育和就业能力的看法是否存在分歧?如果存在这种分歧,就会给孩子们带来隐性成本。当孩子达到工作年龄时,父母选择不再需要的职业可能会永久损害后者的赚钱能力。此外,父母对孩子不精通或不感兴趣的学习领域的选择会危及孩子学习成功的机会。本文旨在讨论这些问题。设计/方法/方法使用混合方法收集数据,结合作者进行的两次当地特殊目的抽样调查的结构化在线问卷和后续访谈。研究生就业调查2(GES2)是英国文化协会赞助的一项分三阶段的研究的第二项,该研究侧重于TNE,该研究对公共和私营部门的几所高等教育机构的学生使用了结构化的在线问卷,并在2015年对学生进行了几次集体访谈。还向少数家长发放了一份结构化问卷。调查结果在就业方面,家长和学生对高等院校的排名大致一致。在国外高等教育机构学习就业的可能性最高。分校排名第二。尽管如此,令人感兴趣的是排名第一和第二的高等教育机构之间的平均分数差异。尽管学生们对分校的评价并不比外国大学差多少,但家长们看到了他们之间的巨大差距——他们对外国大学的评价更高,而对分校的评分更差。这种差异可能是由于父母传统上更喜欢国外学习而不是本地学习,再加上缺乏TNE知识造成的。社会含义认知的一个基本问题是父母和学生如何看待教育的作用。教育是目的地还是旅程?这种脱节会产生后果。考虑到就业性质的变化,对可转移技能的需求,以及下一代将要做的一些工作在今天甚至还不为人所知,父母基于他们所知的情况提出的建议可能不利于他们孩子的职业选择。同样,TNE将传统学位推广到工作途径的方法也是一种保质期有限的传统方法。独创性/价值父母在教育选择中的作用出人意料地很少受到学术界的关注。随着技术变革推动产品和服务创新的速度越来越快,以前未知的工作类型在相对较短的时间内出现了。在这种情况下,父母和他们的孩子之间不匹配的看法的风险变得越来越现实,因为他们的教育经历跨越了一代人。虽然大多数关于父母角色的研究都是在西方国家进行的,但关于东亚父母在孩子教育中的角色的研究要少得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信