Causes of War

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
B. Russell
{"title":"Causes of War","authors":"B. Russell","doi":"10.1353/rss.2023.a904088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"historical perspective to make sense of future conflicts and crises. This is not just abstract theory; a major international crisis is quite likely to occur in your lifetime. This course is guided by a concern for both theory and history. In the first half of the semester we survey the leading theories of the causes of war, using the “levels-of-analysis” framework to categorize these theories and organize our survey. We begin with the “system” level and focus on realist theories of conflict focusing on state power and interest, giving particular attention to balance of power theory and power transition theory. We also examine the “Prisoner’s dilemma” model, deterrence and spiral models, and the “bargaining model of war.” Each of these theories assumes that states’ foreign policies are rational responses to their external environments and designed to maximize the national interest. Other theories suggest that the causes of war derive from factors internal to the state, including the domestic political interests of decision-makers, the economic interests of private groups, public opinion, or organizational processes. We examine these “societal” and “governmental” level theories, along with “individual” level theories that emphasize the role of the belief systems, personalities, and idiosyncracies of political leaders. We illustrate each of the main theoretical arguments with examples from a wide range of historical cases. Among the questions the levels-of-analysis framework leads us to ask is whether the outbreak of wars is due more to states’ external competition for power and security or to their internal political dynamics or the psychological make-up of political leaders.","PeriodicalId":41601,"journal":{"name":"RUSSELL-THE JOURNAL OF THE BERTRAND RUSSELL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSELL-THE JOURNAL OF THE BERTRAND RUSSELL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rss.2023.a904088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

historical perspective to make sense of future conflicts and crises. This is not just abstract theory; a major international crisis is quite likely to occur in your lifetime. This course is guided by a concern for both theory and history. In the first half of the semester we survey the leading theories of the causes of war, using the “levels-of-analysis” framework to categorize these theories and organize our survey. We begin with the “system” level and focus on realist theories of conflict focusing on state power and interest, giving particular attention to balance of power theory and power transition theory. We also examine the “Prisoner’s dilemma” model, deterrence and spiral models, and the “bargaining model of war.” Each of these theories assumes that states’ foreign policies are rational responses to their external environments and designed to maximize the national interest. Other theories suggest that the causes of war derive from factors internal to the state, including the domestic political interests of decision-makers, the economic interests of private groups, public opinion, or organizational processes. We examine these “societal” and “governmental” level theories, along with “individual” level theories that emphasize the role of the belief systems, personalities, and idiosyncracies of political leaders. We illustrate each of the main theoretical arguments with examples from a wide range of historical cases. Among the questions the levels-of-analysis framework leads us to ask is whether the outbreak of wars is due more to states’ external competition for power and security or to their internal political dynamics or the psychological make-up of political leaders.
战争的原因
从历史角度理解未来的冲突和危机。这不仅仅是抽象的理论;在你的一生中很可能会发生一场重大的国际危机。这门课程以对理论和历史的关注为指导。在上半学期,我们调查了战争原因的主要理论,使用“分析层次”框架对这些理论进行分类并组织调查。我们从“制度”层面入手,关注以国家权力和利益为中心的现实主义冲突理论,特别关注权力平衡理论和权力过渡理论。我们还研究了“囚徒困境”模型、威慑和螺旋模型以及“战争谈判模型”。每一种理论都假设国家的外交政策是对其外部环境的理性回应,旨在最大限度地提高国家利益。其他理论认为,战争的原因源于国家内部的因素,包括决策者的国内政治利益、私人团体的经济利益、公众舆论或组织过程。我们研究了这些“社会”和“政府”层面的理论,以及强调政治领导人的信仰体系、个性和特质作用的“个人”层面理论。我们用大量历史案例中的例子来说明每一个主要的理论论点。分析框架的层次让我们要问的问题之一是,战争的爆发更多地是由于国家对权力和安全的外部竞争,还是由于其内部政治动态或政治领导人的心理构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies is published semiannually, in the summer and the winter, by The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster University. Both print and electron ic editions are published. From 1971 until 1999 Russell was titled Russell: the Journal of the Bertrand Russell Archives and was published first by McMaster University Library Press (1971–96) and then by McMaster University Press (1997–99). The ISSN of the print edition is 0036-0163; that of the electronic edition, 1913-8032. Russell is published with the assistance of grants from the Aid to Journals programme of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and from McMaster’s Faculty of Humanities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信