Anthropology, Comparative Studies, and the Classics: Receptions of the ‘Savage’ in the Metropole and the Periphery

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Acta Classica Pub Date : 2020-10-15 DOI:10.1353/acl.0.0004
M. Lambert
{"title":"Anthropology, Comparative Studies, and the Classics: Receptions of the ‘Savage’ in the Metropole and the Periphery","authors":"M. Lambert","doi":"10.1353/acl.0.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That comparative studies, anthropology, and the Classics have been uneasy bedfellows in the study of the Classics in South Africa is well known. At the height of the British Empire, as more and more ethnographies of conquered peoples flooded into the metropole, and more Classically educated administrators and missionaries ventured forth into the colonies equipped with perceptions of the ‘savage other’, dissonances in the discourses generated by receptions of the ‘other’ in metropole and periphery appear. One such dissonance is how Classical scholarship in the metropole used ‘savage analogies’ to illuminate the dark origins of ancient Greek religion, whereas scholarly missionaries in the periphery used Classical analogies to redeem indigenous religions from the kind of ‘othering’ engendered by academic discourses in the metropole. To explore this dissonance, I use the research on Zulu religion of a British missionary in the former colony of Natal, Henry Callaway, to represent the periphery, and Jane Harrison’s work on ancient Greek religion as representative of the metropole.","PeriodicalId":41891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Classica","volume":"1 1","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/acl.0.0004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/acl.0.0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

That comparative studies, anthropology, and the Classics have been uneasy bedfellows in the study of the Classics in South Africa is well known. At the height of the British Empire, as more and more ethnographies of conquered peoples flooded into the metropole, and more Classically educated administrators and missionaries ventured forth into the colonies equipped with perceptions of the ‘savage other’, dissonances in the discourses generated by receptions of the ‘other’ in metropole and periphery appear. One such dissonance is how Classical scholarship in the metropole used ‘savage analogies’ to illuminate the dark origins of ancient Greek religion, whereas scholarly missionaries in the periphery used Classical analogies to redeem indigenous religions from the kind of ‘othering’ engendered by academic discourses in the metropole. To explore this dissonance, I use the research on Zulu religion of a British missionary in the former colony of Natal, Henry Callaway, to represent the periphery, and Jane Harrison’s work on ancient Greek religion as representative of the metropole.
人类学、比较研究和古典学:大都市和周边地区“野蛮人”的接受
比较研究、人类学和古典文学在南非的古典文学研究中一直是令人不安的伙伴,这是众所周知的。在大英帝国的鼎盛时期,随着越来越多的被征服民族的民族志涌入大都市,越来越多受过古典教育的行政人员和传教士冒险进入殖民地,他们对“野蛮的他者”有了认识,在大都市和周边地区,对“他者”的接受产生了话语上的不和谐。其中一个不协调是大都市的古典学术如何使用“野蛮类比”来阐明古希腊宗教的黑暗起源,而外围的学术传教士使用古典类比来从大都市学术话语产生的“他者”中拯救本土宗教。为了探讨这种不和谐,我用英国传教士亨利·卡拉威在前殖民地纳塔尔对祖鲁宗教的研究来代表边缘,用简·哈里森对古希腊宗教的研究来代表大都市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Classica
Acta Classica CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信