Towards a progressive interpretation of Ummah

IF 0.6 0 RELIGION
H. Bachtiar
{"title":"Towards a progressive interpretation of Ummah","authors":"H. Bachtiar","doi":"10.18326/IJIMS.V8I1.87-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"contemporary literatures that had been produced by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars and intellectuals, ranging from Muslim and Western countries. With the progressive perspective of multiple modernities and intercivilisational approach, this paper argues that the concept of Ummah should be interpreted as a modern concept of inclusive cosmopolitan-humanitarian solidarity that emphasise values of liberalism, pluralism, democracy, human rights and sustainable development. This concept has been also strengthened by a sociological representation of the tradition of Islam Nusantara. Its relative historical continuity in the process of the development of the micro sociological dimension of tradition, it explains that this concept of Ummah is not rootless. Consequently, it can be understood that its applicability is relatively possible . Paper ini ingin mengelaborasi wacana pembangunan konsep Ummah yang digali dari pelbagai literatur kontemporer, baik yang berasal dari para sarjana dan intelektual Muslim maupun non-Muslim, baik itu yang berasal dari negara-negara Muslim maupun Barat. Melalui perspektif multiple modernities dan pendekatan lintas-peradaban, paper ini berargumentasi bahwa konsepUmmah sangat perlu kiranya ditafsirkan dan dipahami sebagai konsep modernmengenai solidaritas kemanusiaan yang inklusif dan kosmopolitan. Konsep inimenekankan pentingnya nilai-nilai seperti liberalisme, pluralisme, demokrasi,hak asasi manusia dan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan. Adanya tawaranmengenai konsep ini, didukung oleh representasi sosiologis dari praktik IslamNusantara. Praktik Islam Nusantara tersebut, menunjukkan adanya kontinuitashistoris dalam proses pembangunan tradisi, yang berlaku di dalam dimensisosiologis yang bersifat mikro. Hal ini tentu saja juga menunjukkan bahwakonsep Ummah ini bukanlah hal yang tak berakar dalam realitas kehidupanMuslim. Dengan demikian dapat dimengerti bahwa, penerapan konsep Ummahini sangatlah memungkinkan.","PeriodicalId":42170,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/IJIMS.V8I1.87-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

contemporary literatures that had been produced by Muslim and non-Muslim scholars and intellectuals, ranging from Muslim and Western countries. With the progressive perspective of multiple modernities and intercivilisational approach, this paper argues that the concept of Ummah should be interpreted as a modern concept of inclusive cosmopolitan-humanitarian solidarity that emphasise values of liberalism, pluralism, democracy, human rights and sustainable development. This concept has been also strengthened by a sociological representation of the tradition of Islam Nusantara. Its relative historical continuity in the process of the development of the micro sociological dimension of tradition, it explains that this concept of Ummah is not rootless. Consequently, it can be understood that its applicability is relatively possible . Paper ini ingin mengelaborasi wacana pembangunan konsep Ummah yang digali dari pelbagai literatur kontemporer, baik yang berasal dari para sarjana dan intelektual Muslim maupun non-Muslim, baik itu yang berasal dari negara-negara Muslim maupun Barat. Melalui perspektif multiple modernities dan pendekatan lintas-peradaban, paper ini berargumentasi bahwa konsepUmmah sangat perlu kiranya ditafsirkan dan dipahami sebagai konsep modernmengenai solidaritas kemanusiaan yang inklusif dan kosmopolitan. Konsep inimenekankan pentingnya nilai-nilai seperti liberalisme, pluralisme, demokrasi,hak asasi manusia dan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan. Adanya tawaranmengenai konsep ini, didukung oleh representasi sosiologis dari praktik IslamNusantara. Praktik Islam Nusantara tersebut, menunjukkan adanya kontinuitashistoris dalam proses pembangunan tradisi, yang berlaku di dalam dimensisosiologis yang bersifat mikro. Hal ini tentu saja juga menunjukkan bahwakonsep Ummah ini bukanlah hal yang tak berakar dalam realitas kehidupanMuslim. Dengan demikian dapat dimengerti bahwa, penerapan konsep Ummahini sangatlah memungkinkan.
走向对Ummah的渐进式解读
由穆斯林和西方国家的穆斯林和非穆斯林学者和知识分子创作的当代文学。本文从多元现代化和文明间方法的进步视角出发,认为“世界”的概念应被解释为一个包容性的世界人道主义团结的现代概念,强调自由主义、多元主义、民主、人权和可持续发展的价值观。伊斯兰努桑塔拉传统的社会学表现也加强了这一概念。其相对历史的连续性在传统微观社会学维度发展的过程中,说明了这一“世界”概念并非无根。因此,可以理解,其适用性是相对可能的。本文试图从穆斯林学者和知识分子以及非穆斯林、穆斯林和西方国家的各种当代文学中挖掘出公共概念的发展场景。本文从多元现代化和文明方法的角度,认为公众的概念需要被解释和理解为现代人类包容和世界性团结的概念。这一概念强调了自由主义、多元主义、民主、人权和可持续发展等价值观的重要性。这一概念得到了努桑塔拉岛实践的社会学代表的支持。伊斯兰教Nusantara的实践表明,传统发展的过程是连续的,这种发展发生在微观维度上。当然,这也表明,在穆斯林生活的现实中,这种普遍的概念并不是无穷无尽的。因此可以理解,这一一般概念的应用是非常可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies (IJIMS): This journal should coverage Islam both as a textual tradition with its own historical integrity and as a social reality which was dynamic and constantly changing. The journal also aims at bridging the gap between the textual and contextual approaches to Islamic Studies; and solving the dichotomy between ‘orthodox’ and ‘heterodox’ Islam. So, the journal invites the intersection of several disciplines and scholars. In other words, its contributors borrowed from a range of disciplines, including the humanities and social sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信