THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY IN LITHUANIA: A FEW ISSUES OF TAX LEGISLATION

Q4 Social Sciences
Ingrida Steponavičienė
{"title":"THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY IN LITHUANIA: A FEW ISSUES OF TAX LEGISLATION","authors":"Ingrida Steponavičienė","doi":"10.13165/j.icj.2020.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The structure and purpose of this article is two-fold. Firstly, the article identifies the issue of terminology and content of the two constitutional principles defined by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, namely, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of legal security. Based on the systematic analysis of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, this article discloses the content of the principle of legal certainty as it is understood in Lithuanian constitutional doctrine. It then focuses on the specifics of the principle of legal certainty in Lithuanian tax legislation by discussing selected issues of ensuring legal certainty in Lithuanian tax law through separate elements of this principle. Such issues as promulgation of tax legal acts, establishing the procedure for calculating taxes, the requirements of establishing the tax laws in advance, and the related issue of retrospective tax regulation together with possible shift of the constitutional doctrine in this field, are discussed from the perspective of the imperatives of the principle of legal certainty. This leads to the conclusion that, although Lithuania has a solid statutory background for ensuring the functioning of the principle of legal certainty, the real operation of this principle in the field of tax law, together with changes in the evolving tax law, poses a number of challenges.","PeriodicalId":32140,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2020.06.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The structure and purpose of this article is two-fold. Firstly, the article identifies the issue of terminology and content of the two constitutional principles defined by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, namely, the principle of legal certainty and the principle of legal security. Based on the systematic analysis of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, this article discloses the content of the principle of legal certainty as it is understood in Lithuanian constitutional doctrine. It then focuses on the specifics of the principle of legal certainty in Lithuanian tax legislation by discussing selected issues of ensuring legal certainty in Lithuanian tax law through separate elements of this principle. Such issues as promulgation of tax legal acts, establishing the procedure for calculating taxes, the requirements of establishing the tax laws in advance, and the related issue of retrospective tax regulation together with possible shift of the constitutional doctrine in this field, are discussed from the perspective of the imperatives of the principle of legal certainty. This leads to the conclusion that, although Lithuania has a solid statutory background for ensuring the functioning of the principle of legal certainty, the real operation of this principle in the field of tax law, together with changes in the evolving tax law, poses a number of challenges.
立陶宛法律确定性的宪法原则:税收立法的几个问题
本文的结构和目的是双重的。首先,该条确定了立陶宛共和国宪法法院确定的两项宪法原则,即法律确定性原则和法律保障原则的术语和内容问题。本文在系统分析立陶宛共和国宪法法院判例的基础上,揭示了立陶宛宪法学说中对法律确定性原则的理解。然后,它重点讨论了立陶宛税收立法中法律确定性原则的具体内容,通过该原则的单独要素讨论了确保立陶宛税法中法律确定性的选定问题。从法律确定性原则的必要性角度,讨论了税收法律法案的颁布、税收计算程序的建立、税法的提前制定要求、追溯性税收监管的相关问题以及宪法原则在这一领域的可能转变等问题。由此得出的结论是,尽管立陶宛在确保法律确定性原则发挥作用方面有着坚实的法律背景,但这一原则在税法领域的实际运作,加上不断演变的税法的变化,带来了一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信