Feminism and Geopolitics: A Collaborative Project on the Cunning of Gender Violence

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
L. Abu-Lughod, R. Hammami, N. Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Laura Charney
{"title":"Feminism and Geopolitics: A Collaborative Project on the Cunning of Gender Violence","authors":"L. Abu-Lughod, R. Hammami, N. Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Laura Charney","doi":"10.1353/fem.2022.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:We share perspectives from involvement in an international collaborative project culminating in a book titled The Cunning of Gender Violence: Geopolitics and Feminism, (Duke University Press, 2023). Raising questions about the recent feminist \"success\" in putting gender-based violence and violence against women on the global agenda, as ethnographers, socio-legal scholars, journalists, and activists who focus on the everyday lives of people and the politics of gender, religion, and colonial or imperial violence, especially in the Middle East and South Asia and among immigrants from these regions, we trouble the selective ways these feminist visions and practices have been integrated into state and foreign policies, global security regimes, as well as international development and humanitarian industries. We stage three strategies to rethink the relation between the myriad forms and experiences of gender violence and their problematic codification into a global feminist agenda: first by distinguishing between gender violence (small g) and what we call GBVAW (as apparatus and technology); second by invoking the Hegelian concept of \"cunning\" to capture the ways feminist commitments to addressing violence became folded into world affairs; and third by tracing major circuits of power in which GBVAW operates to suggest why feminists might want to seek alternatives.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"638 - 654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:We share perspectives from involvement in an international collaborative project culminating in a book titled The Cunning of Gender Violence: Geopolitics and Feminism, (Duke University Press, 2023). Raising questions about the recent feminist "success" in putting gender-based violence and violence against women on the global agenda, as ethnographers, socio-legal scholars, journalists, and activists who focus on the everyday lives of people and the politics of gender, religion, and colonial or imperial violence, especially in the Middle East and South Asia and among immigrants from these regions, we trouble the selective ways these feminist visions and practices have been integrated into state and foreign policies, global security regimes, as well as international development and humanitarian industries. We stage three strategies to rethink the relation between the myriad forms and experiences of gender violence and their problematic codification into a global feminist agenda: first by distinguishing between gender violence (small g) and what we call GBVAW (as apparatus and technology); second by invoking the Hegelian concept of "cunning" to capture the ways feminist commitments to addressing violence became folded into world affairs; and third by tracing major circuits of power in which GBVAW operates to suggest why feminists might want to seek alternatives.
女权主义与地缘政治:一个关于性别暴力的合作项目
摘要:我们分享了参与一个国际合作项目的观点,该项目最终出版了一本名为《性别暴力的狡猾:地缘政治与女权主义》的书(杜克大学出版社,2023年)。对最近女权主义在将基于性别的暴力和暴力侵害妇女行为列入全球议程方面取得的“成功”提出质疑,因为民族志学者、社会法律学者、记者和活动家关注人们的日常生活以及性别、宗教和殖民地或帝国暴力的政治,特别是在中东和南亚以及来自这些地区的移民中,我们对这些女权主义愿景和实践被选择性地融入国家和外交政策、全球安全制度以及国际发展和人道主义行业的方式感到不安。我们提出了三个战略来重新思考性别暴力的无数形式和经历与其有问题地纳入全球女权主义议程之间的关系:首先,区分性别暴力(小g)和我们所称的GBVAW(作为设备和技术);第二,援引黑格尔的“狡猾”概念,捕捉女权主义对解决暴力问题的承诺如何融入世界事务;第三,通过追踪GBVAW运作的主要电源回路,来说明女权主义者可能想要寻求替代方案的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信