An Investigation of a Northeast U.S. Cyclone Event Without Well-Defined Snow Banding During IMPACTS

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
B. Colle, Phillip Yeh, Joseph A. Finlon, L. McMurdie, V. McDonald, A. DeLaFrance
{"title":"An Investigation of a Northeast U.S. Cyclone Event Without Well-Defined Snow Banding During IMPACTS","authors":"B. Colle, Phillip Yeh, Joseph A. Finlon, L. McMurdie, V. McDonald, A. DeLaFrance","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-22-0296.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOn 7 February 2020 a relatively deep cyclone (~980 hPa) with mid-level frontogenesis produced heavy snow (20-30 mm liquid equivalent) over western and central New York State. Despite these characteristics, the precipitation was not organized into a narrow band of intensive snowfall. This event occurred during the Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) field campaign. Using coordinated flight legs across New York State, a remote sensing aircraft (ER-2) sampled above the cloud while a P-3 aircraft collected in-cloud data. These data are used to validate several Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations at 2-km and 0.67-km grid spacing using different initial and boundary conditions (RAP, GFS, and ERA5 analyses) and microphysics schemes (Thompson and P3). The differences between the WRF runs are used to explore sensitivity to initial conditions and microphysics schemes. All 18–24 h runs realistically produced a broad sloping region of frontogenesis at mid-levels typically; however, there were relatively large (20–30%) uncertainties in the magnitude of this forcing using different analyses and initialization times. The differences in surface precipitation distribution are small (< 10%) among the microphysics schemes, likely because there was little riming in the region of heaviest precipitation. Those runs with frontogenesis closest to the RAP analysis and a surface precipitation underprediction of 20–30% have too little ice aloft and at low-levels, suggesting deficiencies in ice generation and snow growth aloft in those runs. The 0.67-km grid produced more realistic convective cells aloft, but only 5–10% more precipitation than the 2-km grid.","PeriodicalId":18824,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Weather Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Weather Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0296.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On 7 February 2020 a relatively deep cyclone (~980 hPa) with mid-level frontogenesis produced heavy snow (20-30 mm liquid equivalent) over western and central New York State. Despite these characteristics, the precipitation was not organized into a narrow band of intensive snowfall. This event occurred during the Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast-Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) field campaign. Using coordinated flight legs across New York State, a remote sensing aircraft (ER-2) sampled above the cloud while a P-3 aircraft collected in-cloud data. These data are used to validate several Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations at 2-km and 0.67-km grid spacing using different initial and boundary conditions (RAP, GFS, and ERA5 analyses) and microphysics schemes (Thompson and P3). The differences between the WRF runs are used to explore sensitivity to initial conditions and microphysics schemes. All 18–24 h runs realistically produced a broad sloping region of frontogenesis at mid-levels typically; however, there were relatively large (20–30%) uncertainties in the magnitude of this forcing using different analyses and initialization times. The differences in surface precipitation distribution are small (< 10%) among the microphysics schemes, likely because there was little riming in the region of heaviest precipitation. Those runs with frontogenesis closest to the RAP analysis and a surface precipitation underprediction of 20–30% have too little ice aloft and at low-levels, suggesting deficiencies in ice generation and snow growth aloft in those runs. The 0.67-km grid produced more realistic convective cells aloft, but only 5–10% more precipitation than the 2-km grid.
美国东北部气旋事件在影响期间无明确雪带的调查
2020年2月7日,一个相对较深的气旋(~980百帕)和中层锋生在纽约州西部和中部产生了大雪(20-30毫米液体当量)。尽管有这些特征,但降水并没有形成一条狭窄的强降雪带。这一事件发生在大西洋海岸威胁性暴风雪(IMPACTS)的微观物理和降水调查实地活动期间。一架遥感飞机(ER-2)利用纽约州的协调飞行航段在云层上方进行采样,而一架P-3飞机则在云层中收集数据。这些数据用于验证使用不同初始和边界条件(RAP、GFS和ERA5分析)以及微物理方案(Thompson和P3)在2公里和0.67公里网格间距下的几种天气研究和预测(WRF)模型模拟。WRF运行之间的差异用于探索对初始条件和微观物理方案的敏感性。所有18-24小时的运行都实际地在中层产生了一个广泛的锋生斜坡区;然而,使用不同的分析和初始化时间,这种强迫的大小存在相对较大的不确定性(20-30%)。在微物理方案中,地表降水分布的差异很小(<10%),这可能是因为在降水量最大的区域几乎没有边界。锋生最接近RAP分析,地表降水预测不足20-30%的那些运行,其高空和低水平的冰太少,这表明这些运行中高空的冰生成和雪生长不足。0.67公里的网格在高空产生了更逼真的对流单元,但降水量仅比2公里的网格多5%-10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Monthly Weather Review (MWR) (ISSN: 0027-0644; eISSN: 1520-0493) publishes research relevant to the analysis and prediction of observed atmospheric circulations and physics, including technique development, data assimilation, model validation, and relevant case studies. This research includes numerical and data assimilation techniques that apply to the atmosphere and/or ocean environments. MWR also addresses phenomena having seasonal and subseasonal time scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信