Relationship between household member vaccine acceptance and individual vaccine acceptance among women in rural Liberia

Molly R Mantus, H. Obaje, R. Piltch-Loeb, Jae Won Chung, L. Hirschhorn, M. Subah, S. Mendin, M. Siedner, J. Kraemer
{"title":"Relationship between household member vaccine acceptance and individual vaccine acceptance among women in rural Liberia","authors":"Molly R Mantus, H. Obaje, R. Piltch-Loeb, Jae Won Chung, L. Hirschhorn, M. Subah, S. Mendin, M. Siedner, J. Kraemer","doi":"10.29392/001c.81917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination uptake remains low in Liberia. Social norms, and in particular an individual’s family preferences can have a strong normative influence on health behavior. However, few studies across the globe have explored how behavioral intent about COVID-19 vaccination among household members affects individual vaccination acceptance, particularly in rural, resource-limited settings. We respond to this gap in knowledge by analyzing data from a household survey of women in rural Liberia with the goal of understanding how household COVID-19 beliefs and vaccine behavioral intent correlated with those of individual household members. Data was analyzed from a household survey of 2,620 women aged 15-49 in 2,201 households in rural Grand Bassa County, Liberia, from March to April 2021. The survey included a COVID-19 module on protective health behaviors and intention to accept a COVID-19 vaccine when available. Each household was defined as being concordantly vaccine-hesitant, concordantly vaccine-accepting, or discordant. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify correlates of concordant acceptance, adjusting for potential confounders. The survey found that only approximately one in three households in rural Liberia were fully COVID-19 vaccine accepting. About 42% of households had discordant views on the vaccine, while 33% had concordantly accepting views, and 25% had concordantly hesitant views. The demographic characteristics of households with different vaccine beliefs were similar. Having a household member who accepted the COVID-19 vaccine was associated with an 18.1 percentage point greater likelihood of an individual accepting the vaccine (95% confidence interval, CI=7.3-28.9%, P=0.001). Social norms around vaccine acceptance within households are strongly associated with individual acceptance. Interventions that target hesitant households and individuals could have a significant impact on vaccine acceptance rates.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.81917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination uptake remains low in Liberia. Social norms, and in particular an individual’s family preferences can have a strong normative influence on health behavior. However, few studies across the globe have explored how behavioral intent about COVID-19 vaccination among household members affects individual vaccination acceptance, particularly in rural, resource-limited settings. We respond to this gap in knowledge by analyzing data from a household survey of women in rural Liberia with the goal of understanding how household COVID-19 beliefs and vaccine behavioral intent correlated with those of individual household members. Data was analyzed from a household survey of 2,620 women aged 15-49 in 2,201 households in rural Grand Bassa County, Liberia, from March to April 2021. The survey included a COVID-19 module on protective health behaviors and intention to accept a COVID-19 vaccine when available. Each household was defined as being concordantly vaccine-hesitant, concordantly vaccine-accepting, or discordant. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify correlates of concordant acceptance, adjusting for potential confounders. The survey found that only approximately one in three households in rural Liberia were fully COVID-19 vaccine accepting. About 42% of households had discordant views on the vaccine, while 33% had concordantly accepting views, and 25% had concordantly hesitant views. The demographic characteristics of households with different vaccine beliefs were similar. Having a household member who accepted the COVID-19 vaccine was associated with an 18.1 percentage point greater likelihood of an individual accepting the vaccine (95% confidence interval, CI=7.3-28.9%, P=0.001). Social norms around vaccine acceptance within households are strongly associated with individual acceptance. Interventions that target hesitant households and individuals could have a significant impact on vaccine acceptance rates.
利比里亚农村妇女家庭成员接受疫苗与个人接受疫苗的关系
尽管新冠肺炎疫苗可用,但利比里亚的疫苗接种率仍然很低。社会规范,特别是个人的家庭偏好,可以对健康行为产生强烈的规范性影响。然而,全球范围内很少有研究探讨家庭成员接种新冠肺炎疫苗的行为意图如何影响个人接受疫苗接种,尤其是在资源有限的农村环境中。我们通过分析利比里亚农村妇女的家庭调查数据来应对这一知识差距,目的是了解家庭新冠肺炎信仰和疫苗行为意图与个别家庭成员的信仰和行为意图之间的相关性。2021年3月至4月,对利比里亚大巴萨县2201户家庭中2620名15-49岁女性的家庭调查数据进行了分析。该调查包括一个关于保护性健康行为和接受新冠肺炎疫苗的意图的新冠肺炎模块。每个家庭都被定义为一致的疫苗犹豫、一致的疫苗接受或不一致。拟合多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定一致接受的相关性,并对潜在的混杂因素进行调整。调查发现,利比里亚农村只有大约三分之一的家庭完全接受新冠肺炎疫苗。大约42%的家庭对疫苗的看法不一致,33%的家庭一致接受,25%的家庭一致犹豫不决。具有不同疫苗信仰的家庭的人口统计特征相似。家庭成员接受新冠肺炎疫苗与个人接受疫苗的可能性高18.1个百分点相关(95%置信区间,CI=7.3-28.9%,P=0.001)。家庭内接受疫苗的社会规范与个人接受密切相关。针对犹豫不决的家庭和个人的干预措施可能会对疫苗接受率产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信