Does China’s Financial System Amplify Risks in the Real Economy?

Yanyan Jia, Yi Fang, Zhongbo Jing
{"title":"Does China’s Financial System Amplify Risks in the Real Economy?","authors":"Yanyan Jia, Yi Fang, Zhongbo Jing","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The smooth operation of the financial system can promote economic growth by absorbing risks, while the risks breaking out in the financial system will drag down economic development through risk spillovers and amplification. On this basis, this paper uses secondary industry indices to build a risk spillover network between the real economy and the financial system, and discusses the risk absorption and amplification role of the financial system in China’s economy and finance from the perspective of industry. First, on the whole, the source of risks in China’s economic and financial system lies in the real economy. The financial system plays a role of risk absorption in China’s economic and financial system, demonstrating the professional risk management functions of the financial system. The risk absorption of the financial system is positively correlated with the risks in the real economy, and negatively correlated with the risks in the financial system. Second, from the perspective of the correlation between the financial sub-industry and the real economy, the banking sector has the closest relationship with the real economy and the lowest risk absorption capacity. Third, from the perspective of the internal correlation of the financial system, the internal network correlation of the financial system is asymmetric. Diversified financial industry has stronger risk spillover effect on the banking industry and the insurance industry, while the insurance industry has stronger risk spillover effect on the banking industry. These results are essentially related to the functioning of the financial system, the internal relationship of the financial system and the relationship between the financial system and the real economy.","PeriodicalId":66259,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"3 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The smooth operation of the financial system can promote economic growth by absorbing risks, while the risks breaking out in the financial system will drag down economic development through risk spillovers and amplification. On this basis, this paper uses secondary industry indices to build a risk spillover network between the real economy and the financial system, and discusses the risk absorption and amplification role of the financial system in China’s economy and finance from the perspective of industry. First, on the whole, the source of risks in China’s economic and financial system lies in the real economy. The financial system plays a role of risk absorption in China’s economic and financial system, demonstrating the professional risk management functions of the financial system. The risk absorption of the financial system is positively correlated with the risks in the real economy, and negatively correlated with the risks in the financial system. Second, from the perspective of the correlation between the financial sub-industry and the real economy, the banking sector has the closest relationship with the real economy and the lowest risk absorption capacity. Third, from the perspective of the internal correlation of the financial system, the internal network correlation of the financial system is asymmetric. Diversified financial industry has stronger risk spillover effect on the banking industry and the insurance industry, while the insurance industry has stronger risk spillover effect on the banking industry. These results are essentially related to the functioning of the financial system, the internal relationship of the financial system and the relationship between the financial system and the real economy.
中国的金融体系是否放大了实体经济的风险?
金融体系的平稳运行可以通过吸收风险来促进经济增长,而金融体系中爆发的风险会通过风险溢出和放大来拖累经济发展。在此基础上,本文利用第二产业指标构建实体经济与金融体系之间的风险溢出网络,从产业角度探讨金融体系对中国经济金融的风险吸收和放大作用。第一,从总体上看,中国经济金融体系风险的根源在于实体经济。金融体系在中国经济金融体系中起着吸纳风险的作用,体现了金融体系的专业化风险管理功能。金融体系风险吸收与实体经济风险正相关,与金融体系风险负相关。第二,从金融子行业与实体经济的关联度来看,银行业与实体经济的关联度最密切,风险吸收能力最低。第三,从金融体系内部关联的角度来看,金融体系内部网络关联是不对称的。金融业多元化对银行业和保险业的风险溢出效应更强,保险业对银行业的风险溢出效应更强。这些结果本质上与金融体系的运行、金融体系的内在关系以及金融体系与实体经济的关系有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信