MEDIATION IN POST-WAR RESTORATION IN UKRAINE

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Luiza Romanadze
{"title":"MEDIATION IN POST-WAR RESTORATION IN UKRAINE","authors":"Luiza Romanadze","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-n000432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article addresses the challenges of developing mediation in Ukraine, the lack of effective coordination between courts and mediators, and issues of low awareness in Ukrainian society about mediation. It is argued that Ukrainian courts and mediation in Ukraine are going concurrent ways so that mediation is not integrated into or reinforcing the court-based litigation system. Meanwhile, the national mediation community must mature through the organization of high-quality interaction with the judicial system. Moreover, the war and post-war period will cause a new workload of civil and commercial disputes that are generally suitable for mediation, especially when the disputants residing in different regions after fleeing from war. This article is aimed at finding sustainable and fast solutions for raising awareness of mediation in Ukrainian society and effective coordination between courts and mediators based on the progress already achieved.\nMethodology: This article used doctrinal legal research to evaluate the options of cooperation between courts and mediation, empirical analysis to examine judicial system performance and the mediation community status quo, analyse options for closer cooperation of courts and mediators, and find sustainable solutions for promoting mediation.\nResults and Conclusions: Courts and the mediation community must work together to break the general reliance on traditional litigation; courts should actively promote mediation through sustainable means, and the mediation community should improve the quality control of mediation services, develop a complaint-handling procedure, and further progress with online platforms for choosing a mediator.","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-5.4-n000432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: This article addresses the challenges of developing mediation in Ukraine, the lack of effective coordination between courts and mediators, and issues of low awareness in Ukrainian society about mediation. It is argued that Ukrainian courts and mediation in Ukraine are going concurrent ways so that mediation is not integrated into or reinforcing the court-based litigation system. Meanwhile, the national mediation community must mature through the organization of high-quality interaction with the judicial system. Moreover, the war and post-war period will cause a new workload of civil and commercial disputes that are generally suitable for mediation, especially when the disputants residing in different regions after fleeing from war. This article is aimed at finding sustainable and fast solutions for raising awareness of mediation in Ukrainian society and effective coordination between courts and mediators based on the progress already achieved. Methodology: This article used doctrinal legal research to evaluate the options of cooperation between courts and mediation, empirical analysis to examine judicial system performance and the mediation community status quo, analyse options for closer cooperation of courts and mediators, and find sustainable solutions for promoting mediation. Results and Conclusions: Courts and the mediation community must work together to break the general reliance on traditional litigation; courts should actively promote mediation through sustainable means, and the mediation community should improve the quality control of mediation services, develop a complaint-handling procedure, and further progress with online platforms for choosing a mediator.
乌克兰战后复辟中的调解
背景:本文论述了在乌克兰发展调解的挑战,法院和调解员之间缺乏有效协调,以及乌克兰社会对调解认识不足的问题。有人认为,乌克兰法院和乌克兰的调解是并行的,因此调解没有融入或加强基于法院的诉讼系统。同时,国家调解团体必须通过组织与司法系统的高质量互动而成熟。此外,战争和战后时期将造成新的民事和商业纠纷工作量,这些纠纷通常适合调解,尤其是当纠纷人逃离战争后居住在不同地区时。本文旨在寻找可持续和快速的解决方案,以提高乌克兰社会对调解的认识,并在已经取得的进展的基础上,在法院和调解员之间进行有效协调。方法:本文运用理论法律研究来评估法院和调解之间的合作选择,实证分析来考察司法系统绩效和调解社区现状,分析法院和调解员更紧密合作的选择,并为促进调解找到可持续的解决方案。结果和结论:法院和调解界必须共同努力,打破对传统诉讼的普遍依赖;法院应通过可持续的方式积极推动调解,调解社区应提高调解服务的质量控制,制定投诉处理程序,并进一步推进选择调解员的在线平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信