On the problematic concept of will in Schopenhauer's philosophy. A transcendental interpretation of the corporeality of will.

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Keika Sueda
{"title":"On the problematic concept of will in Schopenhauer's philosophy. A transcendental interpretation of the corporeality of will.","authors":"Keika Sueda","doi":"10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Schopenhauer’s main work, \"The world as will and representation\", he tries to explain the world with an apparatus, representation and will. In his description, Schopenhauer analyzes the body and finds two sides in it, namely will and representation, then he transfers the duality of the body to all beings. However, it is problematic that such two sides are recognized directly in the body. So, in this paper I determine, how the will that is directly perceived in the body is to be seen. In the following I will first show where there are problems in his description and how the “will” is characterized. Based on Schopenhauer’s main work and on his dissertation “the want (das Wollen)” and Schopenhauer's theory of character are discussed. I confirm that “the ideas” are the condition of our perception and actions. According to some research, the ideas also have transcendental functions. Finally, I identify the will, which is recognized directly in the body, with the entire want, and at the same time with the intelligible character. By examining the will on a transcendental level, it can be understood more precisely and also related to the theory of character.","PeriodicalId":40145,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19053/01235095.v7.n28.2021.12431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Schopenhauer’s main work, "The world as will and representation", he tries to explain the world with an apparatus, representation and will. In his description, Schopenhauer analyzes the body and finds two sides in it, namely will and representation, then he transfers the duality of the body to all beings. However, it is problematic that such two sides are recognized directly in the body. So, in this paper I determine, how the will that is directly perceived in the body is to be seen. In the following I will first show where there are problems in his description and how the “will” is characterized. Based on Schopenhauer’s main work and on his dissertation “the want (das Wollen)” and Schopenhauer's theory of character are discussed. I confirm that “the ideas” are the condition of our perception and actions. According to some research, the ideas also have transcendental functions. Finally, I identify the will, which is recognized directly in the body, with the entire want, and at the same time with the intelligible character. By examining the will on a transcendental level, it can be understood more precisely and also related to the theory of character.
论叔本华哲学中有问题的意志概念。意志的肉体性的先验解释。
在叔本华的主要著作《作为意志和表征的世界》中,他试图用一种装置、表征和意志来解释世界。叔本华在他的描述中分析了身体,发现了身体的两个方面,即意志和表征,然后他将身体的二元性转移到了所有的存在中。然而,这两个方面直接在机构中得到承认是有问题的。因此,在这篇论文中,我确定了如何看待身体中直接感知到的意志。在下文中,我将首先展示他的描述中存在的问题,以及“意志”是如何表征的。本文以叔本华的主要著作《欲望》和叔本华人格理论为基础,对其进行了论述。我确认“想法”是我们感知和行动的条件。根据一些研究,这些思想也具有超越功能。最后,我将直接在身体中识别的意志与整个欲望相识别,同时与可理解的性格相识别。通过在先验层面上考察意志,可以更准确地理解它,也可以将其与性格理论联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信