Sophocles Trachiniae 1021–22

IF 0.7 2区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1086/718782

Ludovica Medaglia, Glenn W. Most

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lines 1021–22 of Sophocles’ Trachiniae, which come right after a notorious and probably insoluble textual crux, have received much less attention but are in fact extremely problematic as well. Though these lines can be construed, they cannot be understood adequately. The scholia propose two implausible ancient interpretations; modern scholars have suggested either no less implausible interpretations of the transmitted text or unsatisfactory emendations for it. The coauthors of the present note suggest a different strategy for emending the text, which results in two different and alternative suggested conjectures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Trachiniae Sophocles 1021–22

Sophocles的Trachiniae的第1021-22行紧跟在一个臭名昭著且可能无法解决的文本症结之后，受到的关注要少得多，但事实上也存在极大的问题。虽然这些线可以理解，但不能充分理解。该学派提出了两种令人难以置信的古代解释；现代学者要么对所传文本提出了不可信的解释，要么对其进行了不令人满意的校订。本注释的合著者提出了一种不同的校订策略，这导致了两种不同的、可供选择的推测。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.