Cold-War Cabin Ecologies: Soviet-American Biospheric Thinking

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Eliza Rose
{"title":"Cold-War Cabin Ecologies: Soviet-American Biospheric Thinking","authors":"Eliza Rose","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2022.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article draws a connection between closed-biosphere tropes in Kim Stanley Robinson's Icehenge (1984) and Soviet and American research on closed artificial ecologies. The article contends that during the 1980s, bioregenerative food systems—as research objects and literary tropes—expressed a perception of socialism and capitalism as imperfect yet eternal states. Two challenges are analogized: 1) conceiving political alternatives at the twentieth century's end, and 2) sustaining livable habitats using a closed ecology's limited available resources (for example, by deriving nutrients from waste). Both challenges inspire a mode of aggressive re-use here termed \"strategic recycling.\" To close, the article assesses the ambivalent politics attending biospheric thinking: closed biospheres clarify humans' metabolic enmeshment in their environments, inviting the radical reassessment of organism-environment relations as ratios of useful outputs over required inputs (what one emits over what one eats). The resulting perspective carries both utopian and eugenic implications that make biospheric thinking itself a \"recyclable\" material that can be conscripted with equal ease into emancipatory and reactionary projects.","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"49 1","pages":"267 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2022.0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This article draws a connection between closed-biosphere tropes in Kim Stanley Robinson's Icehenge (1984) and Soviet and American research on closed artificial ecologies. The article contends that during the 1980s, bioregenerative food systems—as research objects and literary tropes—expressed a perception of socialism and capitalism as imperfect yet eternal states. Two challenges are analogized: 1) conceiving political alternatives at the twentieth century's end, and 2) sustaining livable habitats using a closed ecology's limited available resources (for example, by deriving nutrients from waste). Both challenges inspire a mode of aggressive re-use here termed "strategic recycling." To close, the article assesses the ambivalent politics attending biospheric thinking: closed biospheres clarify humans' metabolic enmeshment in their environments, inviting the radical reassessment of organism-environment relations as ratios of useful outputs over required inputs (what one emits over what one eats). The resulting perspective carries both utopian and eugenic implications that make biospheric thinking itself a "recyclable" material that can be conscripted with equal ease into emancipatory and reactionary projects.
冷战舱室生态学:苏美生物圈思想
摘要:本文将金•斯坦利•罗宾逊(1984)的《巨石阵》中的封闭生物圈比喻与苏联和美国对封闭人工生态的研究联系起来。文章认为,在20世纪80年代,生物再生食品系统作为研究对象和文学比喻,表达了对社会主义和资本主义不完美但永恒的看法。有两个挑战可以类比:1)在20世纪末构想政治替代方案,2)利用封闭生态系统有限的可用资源(例如,从废物中获取营养)维持宜居栖息地。这两个挑战都激发了一种积极的再利用模式,称为“战略回收”。最后,文章评估了参与生物圈思维的矛盾政治:封闭的生物圈澄清了人类在其环境中的代谢纠缠,邀请对生物体与环境的关系进行彻底的重新评估,将其视为有用产出与所需投入的比率(一个人排放的东西与一个人吃的东西的比率)。由此产生的观点既有乌托邦的含义,也有优生学的含义,使生物圈思维本身成为一种“可回收”的材料,可以同样容易地被招募到解放和反动项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信